Skip to content
Main Navigation

Salt and Dust


Salt and Dust


May 29, 2026

The dynamic science of Great Salt Lake

In 1991, Utahns and visitors flocked to the eastern end of the Syracuse causeway—which connects Davis County to Antelope Island—waiting for the historically high water levels of Great Salt Lake to fall. At this point, the causeway had been closed for eight years. It was submerged under more than five feet of water in a swollen Farmington Bay. 

As many hoped for, water levels did fall. But, they kept on dropping and dropping. Eventually, in 2022 the lake reached its lowest elevation on record of 4188.5 feet. This drastic, 23-foot drop diminished the lake by 2,350 square miles, an area larger than the state of Delaware. 

These days, Farmington Bay is nearly bone-dry aside from its confluence with the Jordan River to the south. Now, many Utahns are hoping—and even praying—for Great Salt Lake to rise. 

The widespread decline of terminal lakes

Terminal lakes around the world are largely in decline, and believe it or not, other lakes have fared worse. The Aral Sea in present day Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan used to be the fourth largest freshwater lake in the world at 23,600 square miles. Then, during the 1950s, the Soviet Union began to divert its water sources for irrigation—largely for cotton farming.  

As by design, the newly irrigated fields produced high yields of cash crops. With this, came a sizable economic boost to the region. 

However, what was once a vast lake soon lost its magnificent deep-blue color. The lake that was once home to plentiful fish and thriving wetlands was largely replaced by barren lakebed. The lake was so depleted that fewer than ten percent of its former self remained. Soon after, dust storms began to wreak havoc, Aral trout and endemic sturgeon died off, freshwater turned saline and millions of birds either perished or moved elsewhere. 

These tragic and devastating stories like the Aral Sea’s can serve as a warning. We know that when you deplete a natural resource to exhaustion, something else in that system is affected. 

Cataloguing through sedimentation

Great Salt Lake has had pressure on its water resources since the Mormon pioneers began settling in Utah beginning in 1847. In fact, Professor and Department Chair of Geology & Geophysics Gabriel Bowen tells us a pretty clear story of human influence on the lake. Bowen looks at sedimentation of Great Salt Lake, the terminal point for not only water but solid particles (sand, mud, organic bits), and he catalogues events impacting the lake via that sedimentation. 

During the mid 19th century, Mormon settlers arrived in the Salt Lake Valley via Emigration Canyon. Upon their arrival, irrigation projects of a grand scale were planned and installed. Wetlands gave way to canals which delivered water to freshly tilled farmland. The valley that was once a desert turned green. Bowen found that around this time, an unprecedented amount of organic matter reached the lake — a clear indication of an increase in agricultural runoff. 

Then, in 1959 the Lucin Cutoff was constructed by Union Pacific Railroad. This feat of engineering split the lake into the North and South Arm. Prior to 1959, the sediments deposited indicate that the South Arm had equal ratio of water evaporation to input—a state of equilibrium.

However, after 1959 these levels lowered substantially creating two different systems: a South Arm that now acts like an open system (exorheic) and a North Arm that remains a terminal lake (endorheic). As a result, the South Arm remains fresher with levels today hovering around 12.5 percent salinity while the North Arm is nearly three times as salty—around 33 percent

Water can hold approximately 350-360 grams of salt per liter. Currently, salt levels in the North Arm hover around 330 grams per liter. But, in certain parts of the North Arm this saturation level has already been reached and halite salt crystals can be seen floating in the water. 

Extreme conditions still harbor life 

We are reaching a level of extreme that feels beyond extreme. That’s why it’s so hard to believe that this lake can still harbor aquatic life and plenty of it. For a long time, we have known that brine shrimp and brine flies were capable of surviving in Great Salt Lake. But in 2024, U postdoctoral researcher Julie Jung and faculty member Michael Werner discovered a new species of nematode, a microscopic worm commonly referred to as a “roundworm,” hiding right under our nose.

Found in the South Arm, the species likes to reside in the reef-like microbialite structures that cover about one-fifth of the lakebed. This is the most saline environment where nematodes have ever been discovered. Recently, Werner officially described the new species as a tribute to the ancestral lands of the nearby Shoshone tribe Diplolaimelloides woaabi—cementing this discovery permanently.

Even the hypersaline North Arm contains life. Its waters are pink due to halophilic bacteria which we have known of for years. As waters in the North Arm receded, many gypsum crystals, which can be capsules of life, were exposed. The outer layer of these crystals has been known to protect and enclose microbial ecosystems. Current U doctoral candidate Paulina Martinez-Koury and Westminster University Professor Bonnie Baxter decided to investigate what life may live inside those ecosystems. Within the minerals they found microbes, pollens, and a staggering 200 bacteria species—a testament to life’s innate ability to survive. Scientists say it may hold clues for life on other planets, too, especially Mars, which was once replete with salty lakes that dried up as the Red Planet lost its atmosphere and magnetism.

Dust in the wind

The newly dried lakebed, also known as “playa,” provides fascinating opportunities for discovery, but at its core it is its own issue. The playa emits high levels of particulate matter PM10 and PM 2.5, the latter of which can penetrate deeply and be fully absorbed by our lungs to deleterious effect. Kevin Perry, U atmospheric science faculty member who has surveyed dust hotspots around the lake, found that every playa soil measurement of arsenic was ten times beyond the EPA’s recommendations.

But work is being done to understand the implications here as well. Perry has worked alongside his colleague Derek Malia to understand where the dust is likely to impact. Farmington, West Valley City, and Salt Lake City are hit the hardest leaving more than a million people at risk.

Perry is trying to figure out how to prevent this dust from becoming airborne in the first place. It turns out that if you water the playa, the crust can re-form—trapping the dust in place. Interestingly enough, this water could even come from below the lake itself. The presence of phragmites, an invasive grass species on the playa, suggests that there is groundwater present. Geology and Geophysics Professor Bill Johnson confirmed the presence of groundwater using airborne electromagnetic surveys . The water is contained within tightly packed sediments that start at 30 feet below the surface of the lake and descend to 10,000 feet. But more work needs to be done to determine if there is water across this entire range or just a portion.

Team Great Salt Lake

Watering the playa is a viable temporary solution, but experts at the Great Salt Lake Strike Team have determined that the most cost-effective long-term method of lake recovery is to simply increase inflows to the lake. The Strike Team was formed in 2022 and includes faculty from the U like William Anderegg and John Lin of the Wilkes Center for Climate Science and Policy, as well as Perry, and fellow atmospheric scientist Court Strong. Also on hand are state leaders and researchers from Utah State University. Together, the team is working to combine reliable data and actionable policy to make the recovery of Great Salt Lake a reality. This task will be no easy feat, but the Strike Team is committed for the long haul.

The decline of Great Salt Lake is more than concerning, it’s an emergency underscored by an intimidating list of "what ifs." However, many from the U are actively navigating this complex dilemma to solve it. 

Bringing the lake back to its historically healthy levels of 4,198 feet will require major investment and sacrifice. But it is important to note that dedicating time and energy to the lake pays dividends. A stable lake means greater lake effect snow, millions of migratory birds, and clean air. Additionally, taking the time to understand the lake can teach us about Utah's hydrology, extreme organisms that live within the lake, and even life on the planet of Mars 140 million miles away. If we take the road of inaction, we might find ourselves in a similar predicament to the Aral Sea. That said, it is quite clear that the true sacrifice here would be to lose the lake entirely. That's why it's important that work on the lake continues. If it does, it's not likely that the lake is going anywhere anytime soon. 

By Nathan Murthy

Nathan Murthy BS'26, Earth & Environmental Science, is an intern for the Wilkes Center for Climate Science and Policy and the College of Science where he is a science writer. He was the selected student speaker at the College of Science convocation.