College of Science Faculty & Staff Newsletter – August 2025 – Safety

SAFETY

2025 STEM Safety Day | Friday, September 5, 2025 | Cleone Peterson Eccles Alumni House
This free, multi-campus partner event offers seminars, trainings, and sessions designed to help our community better understand and mitigate health and safety hazards associated with working in STEM fields at the U. Whether you spend most of your time in a lab, a patient-facing setting, or an office, you will find relevant sessions to improve safety in your area of work.  To find out more information or to register, click here.

Environmental Health and Safety Partner in Safety Awards
Nominations are now open for the 2025 EHS Partner in Safety Awards. The Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) team is asking for your help to identify individuals who go above and beyond to promote a strong safety culture at the University of Utah. The award honors faculty and staff who demonstrate an outstanding commitment to safety and actively partner with EHS to make their departments, labs, and workplaces safer. Winners will receive a framed certificate and $500 transferred to a Chartfield of their choosing. Up to 5 winners will be announced at the STEM Safety Day on September 5th.  The application/nomination form can be found here: EHS Partner in Safety Award Nomination – Environmental Health and Safety.  Please consider nominating someone who you think is deserving. The application deadline is August 31.

Monthly Safety Tip
As new colleagues and students join the College of Science this fall, we each have an opportunity to ensure that they feel welcomed and instantly know this is a community that values the safety and wellbeing of every individual.  Whether you’re a TA meeting with your lab students on the first day of class, a senior graduate student onboarding a 1st year into your research lab, or a PI holding your first group meeting of the new academic year, make safety a part of the discussion.

“Nobody cares how much you know, until they know how much you care.”   – Theodore Roosevelt

To return to the August COS Faculty & Staff newsletter homepage, click here.

College of Science Faculty & Staff Newsletter – August 2025 – Faculty Highlights

FACULTY HIGHLIGHTS

Rishi Alluri, Research Assistant Professor, School of Biological Sciences

What is your research focus?
I study how neural cells and circuits process information over time to support perception and behavior. My work centers on the neural mechanisms of temporal integration—how neurons accumulate, filter, encode, decode, and transform signals over milliseconds to seconds—and how these computations give rise to phenomena such as perceptual grouping and decision-making. Using a combination of electrophysiology, behavioral analysis, and computational modeling, I investigate general principles of neural coding that extend across sensory systems. I also develop and apply non-viral gene delivery platforms to manipulate and monitor neural circuits with cell-type specificity and temporal precision. In parallel, I design neural network architectures inspired by biological information processing, and I am increasingly interested in material science and the development of silicon photonic systems that could enable next-generation compute engines modeled on neural circuit function.

What are some of your research collaboration interests?
I’m interested in interdisciplinary collaborations spanning molecular and systems neuroscience, circuit physiology, computational modeling, and behavior. I welcome opportunities to work with colleagues on the dynamics of perception, learning, and decision-making, as well as on developing new tools for targeted circuit interrogation. I’m especially excited by comparative and evolutionary approaches that explore how neural computations are conserved or adapted across species. I also seek collaborations at the interface of neuroscience and engineering, particularly in developing biologically inspired computing hardware using photonics and novel materials.


Christopher Miles, Associate Professor, Mathematics 

What is your research focus?

I’m a mathematician ​interested in computational cell and molecular biology. Modern high-resolution experiments can capture molecular activity in stunning, single-molecule detail , but in doing so, produce massive and challenging datasets. To interpret this data, my group blends mathematical modeling—where we write down equations for how systems behave—with machine learning, to identify hidden patterns. A central theme in our work is understanding how cells mitigate, or even exploit, randomness and heterogeneity for function. We’ve recently focused on building models and tools that connect microscopy data to the underlying mechanisms of gene expression to better understand genetic regulation and cell fate.

 What are some of your research collaboration interests?

Close collaboration with experimental scientists is at the heart of my research. My group’s work often has a strong spatial component, and we are recently working most with single-cell and spatial ‘omics’ data, especially spatial transcriptomics at single-molecule resolution. That said, I am always eager to forge new collaborations in any area where mathematical and computational methods can make a tangible impact toward answering biological questions.

What are some of your passions and interests outside of work?

I really enjoy foraging wild food, and am amazed at how many edible or useful plants, berries, and fungi are hidden in plain sight, even here in the city. I’m also passionate about fermentation, especially the aspect of trusting nature to transform familiar ingredients into new and complex flavors. It’s always a fun surprise to taste how a batch of kimchi or a new ferment turns out.

 

To return to the August COS Faculty & Staff newsletter homepage, click here.

 

 

College of Science Faculty & Staff Newsletter – August 2025 – Faculty

faculty news

New Titles or Positions:

Lauren Birgenheier
Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs

 

 

 

Akil Narayan
Associate Dean for Undergraduate and Graduate Studies

 

 

 

Matt Sigman
Associate Dean for Research

 

 

 

 

Vahe Bandarian, Associate Provost in the Academic Affairs Office

Bethany Buck, Associate Provost in the Academic Affairs Office

Aurora Clark, Department Chair, Chemistry

Vahe Bandarian, Associate Provost in the Academic Affairs Office

Bethany Buck, Associate Provost in the Academic Affairs Office

New Faculty:

Peter Pellitier, Assistant Professor, School of Biological Sciences

James Baldwin-Brown, Research Assistant Professor, School of Biological Sciences

Rishi Alluri, Research Assistant Professor, School of Biological Sciences

Christopher Miles, Associate Professor, Mathematics

Uri Shapira, Professor, Mathematics

David Schwein, Assistant Professor, Mathematics

Petar Bakic, Assistant Professor (Lecturer), Mathematics

Tim Tribone, Assistant Professor (Lecturer), Mathematics


Paul Jewell retired from the Department of Geology & Geophysics on June 30, 2025.

 

To return to the August COS Faculty & Staff Newsletter homepage, click here.

 

 

College of Science Faculty & Staff Newsletter – August 2025 – New Staff

NEW STAFF

Madeline Marshall
Associate Director of Student Affairs

 

 

 

Sophia Anderson
Undergraduate Advisor
Chemistry

 

 

 

Scott Dowling
Associate Instructor/Undergraduate Instructor
Chemistry

 

 

 

Natalie Eastwood
Undergraduate Advisor
Chemistry

 

 

 

Ben Holt
IT Specialist
Mathematics

 

 

 

To return to the August COS Faculty & Staff newsletter homepage, click here.

 

College of Science Faculty & Staff Newsletter – August 2025 – Awards

AWARDS

From Chemistry:

Long Luo received the Scialog Award for Automating Chemical Laboratories by the Research Corporation for Science Advancement. https://rescorp.org/2025/06/seven-teams-win-scialog-awards-for-automating-chemical-laboratories/

Sanaz Habibi, a recent Chemistry graduate, was awarded the Thomas G. Stockham Medal for Conspicuously Effective Teaching.  The Stockham Medal is awarded to one university student a year in recognition of exceptional teaching achievement. https://gradschool.utah.edu/funding/fellowships-scholarships-awards/grad-school-administered/thomas-g-stockham-medal.php

From Geology & Geophysics:

Kristine Pankow, 2025-2026 Distinguished Lecturer, Geological Society of America (GSA) (pictured)

Gerard Schuster, SEG Honorary Membership Award, Geology & Geophysics

Fan-Chi Lin, Outstanding Faculty Teaching Award for 2025, Geology & Geophysics

Lauren Birgenheier and Randall Irmis, Outstanding Faculty Research Award, Geology & Geophysics

Gannet Hallar, Excellence in Research Award, Atmospheric Sciences

Jim Steenburgh, Excellence Service Award, Atmospheric Sciences

Derek Malia, Excellence in Teaching Award, Atmospheric Sciences

From Physics & Astronomy:

Tino Nyawelo, APS Fellow and Presidential Societal Impact Scholar, Physics & Astronomy

Tanmoy Laskar, RCSA Scialog Award, Physics & Astronomy

Tanmoy Laskar, VPR 2025 Faculty Fellow Award, Physics & Astronomy

Eric Montoya, NSF Career Award, Physics & Astronomy

Ramon Barthelemy, APS Chair, Forum on Diversity and Inclusion, Physics & Astronomy

Gail Zasowski, Alexander von Humboldt Research FellowshipPhysics & Astronomy

College Awards from Convocation 2025:

William Johnson, Excellence in Research, Geology & Geophysics

Peter Lippert, Excellence in Teaching and Mentoring, Geology & Geophysics

Sivaraman Guruswamy, Distinguished Service, Metallurgical Engineering

Dustin Harper, Outstanding Postdoctoral Research, Geology & Geophysics

Ryan Stolley, Distinguished Educator, Science Research Initiative

Autumn Hartley, Research Scholar, Geology & Geophysics

Alice Parker, Outstanding Undergraduate Student, Chemistry and Mathematics

Samantha Linn, Outstanding Graduate Student, Mathematics

Gordon Kafton, Staff Excellence

David Carrier, Excellence in Safety, School of Biological Sciences

 

To return to the August COS Faculty & Staff newsletter, click here.

 

College of Science Faculty & Staff Newsletter – August 2025 – Events

EVENTS / ANNOUNCEMENTS

2025 STEM Safety Day | Friday, September 5, 2025 | Cleone Peterson Eccles Alumni House
This free, multi-campus partner event offers seminars, trainings, and sessions designed to help our community better understand and mitigate health and safety hazards associated with working in STEM fields at the U. Whether you spend most of your time in a lab, a patient-facing setting, or an office, you will find relevant sessions to improve safety in your area of work.  To find out more information or to register, click here.

Faculty Workshop:  I’m Tenured! Now What? | Friday, August 29, 2025 | 9:00 – 12:00 pm | TBD
This workshop is for faculty members in their first- or second-year post-tenure. Topics include writing External Evaluation Letters, serving on RPT committees, pursuing and rethinking your research agenda, service loads, mentorship of junior faculty, and other topics of interest to the group.  Please RSVP at the link here no later than Friday, August 15, 2025.

Women’s Leadership Day | Thursday, September 18, 2025 | 8:00 – 4:00 pm | Cleone Peterson Eccles Alumni House
Cultivating Leadership Vitality:  Your Blueprint for Self-Care & Sustainable Growth.  Registration is now open.
Questions:  amelia.hopkins@hsc.utah.edu
https://uofuhealth.utah.edu/faculty/faculty-development/leadership/womens-day

To return to the August COS Faculty & Staff newsletter homepage, click here.

‘The elephant in the room’ for SciComm

‘The elephant in the room’ for sciComm


August 5, 2025
Above:  Assuming the position for your daily dose of science communication

Scientists are crucial voices in the public debate about wicked problems — societal-scale, high-stakes issues with no clear solutions, like pandemics and artificial intelligence. In the past, experts reached the masses through journalists at traditional news outlets.

Today, science discourse happens online, where science content competes for attention with posts from influencers, advocacy groups, conspiracy theorists and other unverified sources.

One wicked problem, COVID-19, highlighted how ill-prepared scientific institutions are to utilize modern media effectively. The struggle to adapt is partly due to social media platforms preventing meaningful research, according to a new article.

“So many people are getting information in current online environments, including on social media. Not studying these platforms is not an option,” said Isabelle Freiling, assistant professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Utah and co-author of the article. “If we know how people make sense of information in those spaces, then we can use that to communicate science towards those realities. But if we don’t get access to the relevant social media data, it’s just a guessing game.”

Isabelle Freiling, assistant professor, Department of Communication, fellow, One-U Responsible AI Initiative. Credit: Tony Sams.

Without buy-in from social media companies, researchers can only access limited data using tools like application programming interfaces (APIs). APIs act as intermediaries that fulfill information requests, for example, “Find all posts with keyword ‘AI.’” This method rarely captures the full picture because platforms pre-process and shape the data in unknown ways. Academia-industry collaborations can yield more complete datasets, but these partnerships have built-in conflicts of interest.

“We as a scientific community need to address the elephant in the room: Are we really finding true results here? Or are we finding what platforms wants us to find?” said Freiling. “Social media companies have all the power over what data they give to researchers. We would never accept such conflicts of interest in research in the pharma or tobacco industry.”

Moving forward, the authors call for a reimagining of science communication and research, which will require a deep commitment to changes within science itself.

“The scholarly community lacks clear guidelines for evaluating the academic value of those social media collaboration studies that give access to otherwise inaccessible data, while at the same time sacrificing control over to the platforms. That needs to change,” she continued.

The article, published on June 30 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, lays out the unique challenges for science communication arising both from the technology landscape itself and from factors of use, ownership and regulation in an evolving media environment.

A pathway forward

Communication doesn’t happen in a vacuum. In mere seconds, science content must draw in multitasking, doomscrolling audiences while gaming secret algorithms that decide what users will see.

“The algorithms on social media prioritize content that gets people’s attention, and often times our scientific messages aren’t crafted to be very attention grabbing,” said Freiling, who is also a fellow at the U’s One-U Responsible AI Initiative. “Focusing on communicating science accurately is not enough to reach people.”

Establishing evidence-based guidelines for communicating science on social media should be a priority for the scientific community, the article states. This requires an empirical approach to understanding audiences, crafting messages, mapping communication landscapes and most importantly, evaluating the efficacy of communication efforts.

Read the full article by Lisa Potter in @The U

Secret weapon in the race to mine more minerals

secret weapon in the race to mine more minerals

 


August 5, 2025
Above: Earth AI uses software and proprietary drilling hardware to find, verify, and sell multi-billion-dollar mineral projects. Credit: Earth AI; Alyssa Powell/BI

The US is scrambling to reduce its reliance on foreign sources of critical minerals.

The raw materials are essential inputs for modern technology. Smartphones, 5G networks, and military weapons like fighter jets are built using these materials, and they continue to be used to spur innovation. Lithium powers electric vehicle batteries, copper keeps data centers running, and silicon forms the foundation of semiconductors.

Demand is rising fast, with the global critical minerals market projected to reach nearly $500 billion by 2030, said Kings Research, a market research firm. Yet the US still relies heavily on imports. As of 2024, the country imported 100% of 12 out of 50 designated critical minerals, including graphite, manganese, and gallium, according to the United States Geological Survey, many of which come from China.

Now, under the second Trump presidency, the US is pushing to reestablish its dominance in mineral production. The administration has made domestic manufacturing a national priority, issuing an executive order to boost mining on American soil and imposing 50% tariffs on imported metals like steel and aluminum.

Rebuilding domestic mineral supply could strengthen the economy and improve national security. But it could also lead to supply gaps, potentially driving up the cost of materials that power innovation.

To prevent bottlenecks, startups and legacy tech companies are turning to artificial intelligence. Their AI tools promise to speed up mineral discovery and reduce supply chain risks in a volatile geopolitical climate.

But in a highly regulated industry where progress is slow, some experts question whether AI can deliver on its promises.


Startups are racing to reshape mineral exploration

Startups are betting on AI to discover new mineral deposits — and some are seeing early results.

Earth AI uses predictive software and proprietary drilling hardware to find, verify, and sell multi-billion-dollar mineral projects. Its algorithms are trained on decades of historical data from Australia, including past successes and failures of mineral discovery, to pinpoint hydrothermal systems: heated, mineral-rich waters likely to hold valuable deposits.

After identifying a promising site, the company drills using its own rigs and analyzes rock samples to confirm the presence of metal. Once proven, the site is sold to larger mining firms.

Earth AI said it has a success rate of 75% — far above the industry average of less than 1%. Over the last 12 months, the company said it has already made three discoveries in Australia, one of which is indium, a rare metal used in touchscreens and semiconductors for AI hardware. It's also discovering untapped reserves rich with minerals. In late July, Earth AI's software identified a massive underground trove of nickel and palladium in the east coast of Australia the company will drill.

By using AI, Earth AI told Business Insider it can cut mineral discovery timelines from years to months.

"We think that we can create the most value by drilling into the ground, proving that 'Yes, there are chemical concentrations of metal there,'" said Monte Hackett, CFO of Earth AI.

Terra AI is also betting that AI can speed up the industry's slow discovery process.

"Despite decades of investment in sensors and data, we're doing worse every year," said John Mern, cofounder and CEO of Terra AI. "The amount of metal added to the global supply this year is 90% lower than it was in 1990."

Terra's software uses AI to ingest layers of geological data — like magnetic field readings and seismic activity — used to generate thousands of underground maps to identify the most promising places to drill.

Mern said its AI-first approach is already being piloted on rare earth projects in the US and by mining companies across the Americas, Africa, and Europe. He added that Terra's platform could cut the 17-year average mine development timeline in half.

Investors see AI applications in mining as a major opportunity. Founders Factory, a UK-based venture firm, recently partnered with mining giant Rio Tinto to launch an accelerator backing 12 startups a year — including Terra AI.

Jack Kennedy, an investor at Founders Factory, sees mining as a $2 trillion industry that's been "untouched" by tech innovation. He compares mining to a "waste management business," where tons of earth are moved to extract small amounts of metal.

"AI is essentially a way to try and process tons of different data points to make efficiencies," Kennedy told BI. Doing so, he added, translates to reductions in waste, costs, and environmental impact.


Legacy players use AI to secure the supply chain

Legacy firms are also getting in on the action.

Exiger, a supply chain management software provider, helps governments and Fortune 500 companies track and secure critical mineral supply chains. Its AI model breaks down products into digital twins — detailed virtual versions that map the materials inside — then traces the material composition of the products using a database of 10 billion transaction records.

The database includes commercial datasets purchased from custom brokers and invoice processes, financial data, engineering specifications, build-to-print drawings, material declarations, and manufacturing process documents.

Using AI to assess a company's supply chain gives clients visibility into the vulnerabilities within their mineral supply chains, like where they may be over-reliant on certain countries and geopolitical risks. In turn, clients can make informed decisions when adjusting their mineral supply chain strategy.

In one case, Exiger identified how to extract germanium — a rare earth mineral used in fiber optics and chips — from coal ash and smelter waste in the US, potentially reducing foreign dependence.

"When China restricted exports on rare earths, it exposed customers to price volatility and geopolitical uncertainty," Brandon Daniels, CEO of Exiger, told BI. "Our platform helps clients navigate that risk with a level of precision previously unattainable."


The limitations of AI

Rajive Ganguli

Still, AI isn't a magic solution.

Rajive Ganguli, the Malcolm McKinnon Professor of Mining Engineering at the University of Utah with decades of experience applying AI in the field, said the technology is only as good as the data it's trained on. High-quality, hard data — like drill hole information and physical samples — is often scarce, expensive, and difficult to obtain. [He spoke on behalf of the Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration which represents the entire North American manufacturing industry.]

"AI on bad numbers does not result in good answers," Ganguli told BI. He also points out that many "AI discoveries" happen in areas already known to geologists. The technology, he said, doesn't work as well in unexplored, data-poor regions.

Additionally, the startups that spoke to BI said that the mining industry remains skeptical about embracing new technologies, making the adoption of AI in the critical mineral discovery process an uphill battle.

That said, Ganguli believes the biggest obstacles to scaling up mineral production aren't technological, but systemic. In the US, companies often wait 10 to 15 years to get permits approved.

Even though the Trump administration is making moves to fast-track permitting, the process continues to remain bottlenecked in the near term. Despite early talks with US clients, Earth AI hasn't begun exploration in the country due to delays that can drag on for years.

Experts agree that AI won't replace humans. Geologists and engineers are still essential for interpreting AI outputs and making final decisions about where to drill.

"This isn't a lab problem," Ganguli said regarding mineral discovery, adding that "domain experts" are crucial to understanding how the machines operate, what the data means, and how the site actually works.

Even so, companies believe AI can play a key role in strengthening the US mineral supply chain.

But even with the best tools, the US is unlikely to do it alone.

"The reality is, the majority of our supply chain is going to come from beyond our borders," Terra AI CEO Mern said. "We need responsible international partners to secure it."

by

The violent events of deep space

The Violent Events of Deep Space


August 4, 2025
Above: John Matthews explains how a multiple telescope arrays are placed in hopes of capturing cosmic rays as they enter Earth’s atmosphere. Credit: Mike Anderson, KSL TV

Scientists at the University of Utah, along with others around the world, are taking a close look at deep space, with an unusual array of telescopes in the desert of Central Utah.

John Matthews checks on a scintillator. Credit: Mike Anderson, KSL TV.

About 1,000 square miles are covered with 60 telescope arrays, made up of specialized mirrors, and about 500 stations called scintillators.

“We don’t know what they are, but they’re big, huge, violent objects with extreme electric fields, extreme magnetic fields,” Matthews said. “And, could be something like a black hole that’s eating something, like maybe even another black hole. And it’s swirling around as it’s going in.”

Matthews said the mysterious events appear to be even more violent than a supernova. The evidence comes down in what’s called cosmic rays. They can’t be seen with the naked eye. While the hope is for the telescope arrays to capture the rays entering the atmosphere, the scintillators are there to grab what’s left as the particles spread out onto the desert surface.

“The events that you see with both detectors, that’s much more powerful, because now you can combine all this data and figure out more precisely … where did it come from,” Matthews said.

Read the full story by Mike Anderson at KSL 5 TV