Evolutionary Biologist, Boundary Pusher, Occasional Lab Hazard

Biologist David Carrier Retires


July 1, 2025
Above: In his lab, David Carrier: "If you're going to study fighting, sometimes you have to get punched in the face."

An evolutionary biologist, boundary pusher and occasional lab hazard, Dave Carrier didn't just study evolution. He tested it — on himself, on treadmills, and sometimes in the ring.

Over a career spanning more than four decades, Carrier pushed the boundaries of what a biologist could ask, explore, or survive. From human fists to facial hair, from panting pronghorns to defrosting wolves, his curiosity led him everywhere—including the pages of Science, the airwaves of "This American Life," and the stage of the Ig Nobel Prizes.

Running Down an Idea — Literally

"In the summer of [1984] my brother and I go to Wyoming to try to run down an antelope. The idea is not to run faster than the antelope — only cheetahs can run faster than pronghorn antelope — but to run longer and farther in the heat of the day. My brother think it'll take about two hours, and then the antelope will overheat and collapse. We drive off the interstate and down a dirt road for a few miles... ."

One of Carrier’s earliest big ideas was that humans evolved to be endurance runners. Not sprinters, like cheetahs—but marathoners. His “Running Man” hypothesis suggested that early humans could chase prey over long distances until the animals collapsed from heat exhaustion, thanks to human adaptations like sweating, upright posture, and a springy gait. Running is "one of the reasons we top the food chain. Before supermarkets and food processors, before rifles and four-wheel-drives, we used to outrun our food, ”persistence hunting," Carrier called it.

The Running Man hypothesis, published in 1984, was met with skepticism from the scientific community, and from his own Ph.D. advisor, Dennis Bramble. So Carrier did what any committed scientist would: he tried it himself. He and his brother Scott Carrier (a journalist and radio producer) decided to chase pronghorn antelope across the plains of Wyoming — on foot.

Listen to 'Running After Antelope,' on 'This American Life" here.

The Wyoming Department of Natural Resources politely declined their request for permission. So, naturally, they did it anyway. The pronghorns were unbothered. The Carriers were exhausted. But the story lived on, later aired on This American Life, and eventually helped usher in a renaissance of interest in human endurance running and persistence hunting. The Running Man had arrived. Today, the "Running Man" hypothesis is cited in numerous anthropology texts and inspired a chapter in the 2009 bestseller, "Born to Run," by Christopher McDougal.

Punch First, Publish Later

Later in his career, Carrier turned his attention to a different kind of movement: punching. He began asking whether the human hand evolved to form a fist for striking—something no other primate can do.

To test the theory, Carrier’s lab designed experiments using cadaver arms to measure the forces involved in punching versus slapping. But this wasn’t just a theoretical exercise. At one point, a student — experienced in mixed martial arts —punched Carrier in the face. Repeatedly. For science. In a now-legendary twist, Carrier wore glasses during the test, banking on the unwritten rule: you don’t hit a guy wearing glasses. It didn’t help.

Then came the facial hair question: could beards protect the jaw in combat? Using wooly samples on a test rig, Carrier and colleagues found that bearded “faces” absorbed more impact than bare ones. The findings earned him the 2021 Ig Nobel Peace Prize for biology — a satirical award that honors science that “makes people laugh, then think."

Carrier’s Ig Nobel lecture, appropriately titled “Beards and Face Punching,” has since become a cult classic among fans of creative science. View lecture video here.

'David is the only PI I know who would get punched by a student, grow a beard for data, and still offer to take you out for a coffee after.'  ~Jeremy Morris, former Ph.D. student

 

Click the photo below to watch the RadioWest video of "Made to Fight."
viewer discretion is advised

David Carrier is an evolutionary biologist at the University of Utah. He co-authored a paper that argued the human fist evolved for fighting. He and his team were caught off guard by the controversy it generated.

The Human Treadmill (and Other Lab Hazards)

The Carrier Lab was notorious — in the best possible way — for its experimental zeal. Students were frequently found running on treadmills, not metaphorically, but literally, in studies examining biomechanics and locomotion. Countless shelter dogs found new homes with biology faculty and students after getting fit by participating in running experiments. Other projects involved sudden impacts, high-speed video, and a now-infamous freezer failure that involved defrosting wolf carcasses.

But Carrier wasn’t just eccentric — he was an exceptional mentor. Students came out of his lab sharper, bolder and occasionally bruised, but always inspired. His work combined evolutionary theory with experimental rigor and a sense of humor that kept even the most skeptical audiences paying attention.

A Career that Made an Impact—Literally

Carrier’s research touched on everything from breathing patterns in locomotion, to the mechanics of head injuries in football, to the evolutionary role of human aggression. His contributions have shaped how we understand the design and function of the human body — whether sprinting across a plain or bracing for a hit.

Now, as his scientific career draws to a conclusion , one question lingers: who else would get punched in the face to prove a point? Who would grow a beard for science? Who would literally run after antelope to test a hypothesis?

The answer is no one. And that’s the problem with being incomparable.

David Carrier retires with an “Ig Nobel" and leaves behind a legacy that’s equal parts unconventional, bold, and brilliant. His experiments will be cited, his stories retold, and his impact felt — in academic journals, in student memories and maybe even in the next punchy evolutionary theory.

By Tanya Vickers
Communications Editor, School of Biological Sciences

This story is based on a retirement tribute given by
biology faculty member and Carrier's colleague, Neil Vickers, April 25, 2025.

 

From Toxin to Tonic

From Toxin to Tonic


June 26, 2025

Could a toxin from one of the planet’s most venomous animals improve treatments for diabetes and hormone disorders?

Quite possibly, according to a University of Utah-led international research team. The team identified a substance in the venom of a predatory marine cone snail that mimics somatostatin—a human hormone that regulates blood sugar and hormone levels. The very traits that make it lethal in the ocean could help scientists engineer safer, more effective therapies for serious conditions.

Baldomero "Toto" Olivera

“Venomous animals have, through evolution, fine-tuned venom components to hit a particular target in the prey and disrupt it,” says Helena Safavi, associate professor of biochemistry and senior author on the study. Studying how the component affects normal pathways provides “a bit of a shortcut” for medicinal chemists, she notes.

Somatostatin acts as a biological brake pedal, regulating blood sugar and hormone levels. The cone snail toxin consomatin mimics this effect—but with a crucial difference. Researchers found that unlike somatostatin, which interacts with multiple proteins, consomatin homes in on a single target.

In fact, the cone snail toxin is more precisely targeted than the most specific synthetic drugs designed to regulate hormone levels. Consomatin’s effects on blood sugar could make direct therapeutic use risky for people with diabetes, but by studying its structure, researchers could design drugs for endocrine disorders that have fewer side effects. Plus, consomatin contains an unusual amino acid that prevents it from breaking down quickly, offering potential for long-lasting treatments.

For over 50 years, the U has been a hot spot for research into snail venom’s pharmacological properties. The legacy began when renowned cone snail scientist Baldomero Olivera arrived in Utah in 1970 from his native Philippines. Olivera and other faculty from the U’s School of Biological Sciences, including Samuel Espino, contributed to the recent study, which was conducted in collaboration with the University of Copenhagen.

This article originally appeared in U Magazine, Summer 2025, pg. 10. Read more about the enduring continuum of basic science in the School of Biological Science to impactful applications in UofU Health here

Wilkes Center names leadership team for expanded climate mission

Wilkes Center names leadership team for expanded climate mission


June 19, 2025
Above: Fielding Norton, John Lin. Credit: Todd Anderson

Climate physicist Fielding Norton and U atmospheric scientist John Lin take new positions.

The Wilkes Center for Climate Science & Policy at the University of Utah has selected Fielding Norton as its new managing director and John Lin as scientific director to lead the center’s increasing focus on translating climate research into real-world solutions. Norton, a climate scientist and startup investor and advisor, will head the center's overall strategy and operations, while Lin, a U atmospheric sciences professor, will oversee its research initiatives and academic programs.

The Wilkes Center, founded in 2022 by philanthropists Clay and Marie Wilkes, connects rigorous climate research with practical solutions to address environmental and human health challenges.


A vision for broader impact

Fielding Norton at Climate Roundtable

Norton began his career as a science and math educator, then earned his M.S. in applied physics and Ph.D. in earth and planetary sciences at Harvard University before working in the global insurance/reinsurance industry for more than 25 years. There, his teams used science and engineering-based models to manage and price the risk of extreme disasters including floods, hurricanes and wildfires. Norton’s most recent executive role was chief enterprise risk officer of XL Group, a Fortune 100 global insurer and reinsurer based in Bermuda. Now, Norton invests in and advises startups in the insurtech (insurance technology) and climatech (climate technology) space, and serves as senior fellow at the U’s College of Science.

As managing director, Norton’s ambition is to expand the Wilkes Center's benefits to society in several ways. For example, building on the success of the Wilkes Climate Prize, which has funded three promising climate solutions, Norton envisions the center supporting the innovation ecosystem more broadly.

“Now that the Climate Launch Prize attracts more than 1,000 applicants per year, we’re looking to partner with U students, faculty, and alumni, and with investors in Utah, the U.S., and worldwide to fund, incubate, and accelerate the growth of innovative startups that promote growth and energy abundance while decreasing the carbon intensity of our economy.”

Norton also sees opportunities for the Wilkes Center to support communities’ climate resiliency. As wildfires increasingly threaten homes and livelihoods across the West, Norton is working across the U and with external partners to pilot programs that help homeowners and businesses assess and cost-effectively mitigate their risk, both to protect their property and to be more insurable. This demonstrates how the center's research and partnerships can directly address the ways climate change impacts people's daily lives.

"A changing climate is not an abstract scientific challenge—it amplifies risk for communities and increases uncertainty about the future,” said Norton. “We bridge cutting-edge research with practical solutions that make a real difference in people's lives."

Expanding scientific leadership

John Lin. Credit: Todd Anderson

Having served as associate director for the past three years, John Lin brings deep expertise to his new role as scientific director. A Harvard University-trained atmospheric scientist, Lin has led innovative research projects on greenhouse gases and air pollution, including partnering with Google to equip their street view cars to measure air pollution street-by-street across Salt Lake County. His research group oversees greenhouse gas and air quality observations in the Salt Lake area and the Uinta Basin, and works regularly with satellite observations from NASA to determine carbon emissions from cities around the world.

As the Wilkes Center prepares to move into the new L. S. Skaggs Applied Science Building this fall, Lin sees the transition as more than just a change of address. Beyond providing more space and visibility on campus, the move will enable deeper collaboration with students, faculty and researchers across disciplines. This increased capacity arrives at a critical moment, as significant opportunities await the center's attention—like supporting efforts to improve air quality along the Wasatch Front ahead of the 2034 Winter Olympic Games. 

Lin's expertise positions the Wilkes Center to play a leading role in developing solutions for the region's air quality challenges. As a trusted leader and collaborator on complex policy issues such as the receding Great Salt Lake, the Wilkes Center is well-positioned to bring together stakeholders and drive meaningful progress on air quality.

“I'm incredibly honored and excited to step into the scientific director role and help guide the center's research initiatives forward,” said Lin. “The Wilkes Center has incredible momentum. I will continue building on this foundation and work with the managing director to expand the center’s impact.”

The new positions come as founding director William Anderegg prepares to step down on June 30 after three years of establishing the center as a national leader in climate research and collaboration. 


A unified vision

“With Fielding and John at the helm, we’re entering an exciting new chapter extending the Wilkes Center’s international prominence in bridging academic research with actionable solutions,” said Peter Trapa, vice provost and senior dean of the Colleges and Schools of Liberal Arts and Sciences at the U. “I’m confident their leadership will drive meaningful, lasting change.”

Pearl Sandick, interim dean of the U’s College of Science, also praised the center’s new direction. "John's scientific expertise paired with Fielding's vision for practical climate solutions creates an ideal leadership team for the Wilkes Center," said Sandick. "Their complementary strengths will help the organization continue its trajectory as a leader in climate research and innovation.”

by Bianca Lyon

Wilkes Center Leadership Transition


June 19, 2025
Above: William "Bill" Anderegg at the opening session of the 2025 Wilkes Center Summit in May. Credit: Todd Anderson

Inaugural Director William Anderegg has established a legacy of communicating science and convening innovators at The Wilkes Center for Climate Science & Policy

After three years as the founding director of the Wilkes Center for Climate Science & Policy at the University of Utah, William Anderegg, professor in the School of Biological Sciences, will step down as the center’s director on June 30th.

Fielding Norton, a venture investor with a climate background, will lead the center’s overall strategy and operations as managing director, while John Lin, a University of Utah atmospheric sciences professor, will oversee the center’s research initiatives and academic programs.

“It has been an incredible privilege to launch the Wilkes Center and guide it through these foundational years,” said Anderegg. “I remain deeply optimistic about addressing climate challenges, and that optimism is fueled by the remarkable work of our faculty, students, and team. They continue to inspire me with their innovative research and commitment to developing real-world climate solutions.”

A solid foundation for climate innovation

Under Anderegg’s leadership, the Wilkes Center positioned the U as a state, national and international leader in science-based climate solutions. Created in 2022 and founded by Clay and Marie Wilkes, the center was designed to promote research, inform public policy and support entrepreneurial solutions to the challenges that climate change poses to society and ecosystems.

Among its major accomplishments, the center launched the annual international Wilkes Climate Prize and several annual events including the Climate Solutions Hackathon for students, the Wilkes Climate Summit and a public speaker series. The center also supported the hires of new climate-focused faculty across campus as well as the creation of the Great Salt Lake Strike Team, a task force designed to inform strategies to increase the lake’s water level, extending its influence beyond the U campus.

Anderegg’s deep expertise in climate change impacts on forests and society in the western U.S. and around the world helped steer the center’s focus during its initial years. He oversaw nation-wide collaborations to develop policy recommendations for nature-based climate solutions, which included partnerships with Microsoft, among others.

“I’m excited to continue and expand our research at the science-policy interface, particularly around the climate risks to forests and society of wildfire, drought, and other disturbances,” Anderegg said.

“It has been an incredible privilege to launch the Wilkes Center and guide it through these foundational years. I remain deeply optimistic about addressing climate challenges, and that optimism is fueled by the remarkable work of our faculty, students, and team. They continue to inspire me with their innovative research and commitment to developing real-world climate solutions.”
~ William Anderegg

Anderegg’s tenure as director solidified his reputation as a world-renowned climate scientist. In 2023, he was awarded both the National Science Foundation’s Alan T. Waterman Award and the Blavatnik Foundation’s National Laureate in Life Sciences award for his work on forest ecosystems and climate change. Anderegg was also recognized as one of the world’s most highly cited researchers by Clarivate.

Anderegg will be remembered not only for his own research and his expert convening of climate innovators but his skill at communicating science to a wide variety of audiences. He demonstrated this routinely, whether as a moderator of a panel on Utah’s energy future, crafting the messaging of center publications or, each year, insightfully framing the annual Wilkes Summit as a forum for thoughtful, real-life, real-time solutions to one of the defining issues of our time. In his final Summit appearance, for example, he memorably summarized the “three pillars of urgency” related to climate change: “it’s here, it’s us, it’s damaging.”

Anderegg’s signature of conveying data-driven science in a concise and clear way continually resonated with academics, industry leaders and policy makers alike.

“Bill’s leadership of the Wilkes Center has inspired so many young science scholars and future innovators across the University of Utah,” said Pearl Sandick, dean of the College of Science. “We are grateful for his leadership for helping launch the center and we’re excited to see what new research projects and partnerships will emerge in the coming years.”

This story originally appeared on the Wilkes Center website here.

SRI Stories: Dance of Discovery

SRI Stories: Dance of Discovery


March 18, 2025
Above: Shrinivasan “Cheenu” Raghuraman

“If you close your eyes and put your fingers together above your head, you know exactly where the tips of your fingers are, right? That property is called ‘proprioception’, your body knows where your limbs are in three dimensional space."

The same property is there for fish too. They know exactly where they're swimming in a three dimensional space, and that helps them navigate.”

When explaining his work with cone snail venom, Shrinivasan “Cheenu” Raghuraman uses this simple example to explain the concept of proprioception, an aspect of the fish’s neurology that the snail’s venom targets. It’s a term most wouldn’t recognize upon hearing it, but with such a relatable comparison the path to understanding is made clear. 

Finding such comparisons is a vital science communication skill in both teaching students and presenting findings, but it wasn’t science that taught this example to Raghuraman. It was dancing. As part of the ensemble of Nitya Nritya Foundation, which promotes (and performs) classical Indian dance and music, he needs to understand how one’s limbs are positioned. This in turn inspired the comparison to his scientific work. 

Ironic as it may seem, it’s these aspects outside of the scientific fields that bring better clarity of the concepts within them. And Raghuraman has taken these paths of understanding to heart within his Science Research Initiative (SRI) streams. Students are given projects tailored to their goals to better streamline their learning process. Interested in discovering new drugs? A project is set up specifically focused on peptides (chains of amino acids within the snail venom) that all have therapeutic potential and what the drug testing process is like. Drawn to the bioelectricity of the brain itself? Or the policies and science writing around the health sciences? In each case a project is set up using snail venom as the subject model in a way that encourages those interests. 

Such practices benefit both students and teacher, for as the young scientists  receive teaching streamlined towards their interests, Raghuraman in turn learns a new way to approach and understand his field of study. He’s quick to explain this importance, that, “It’s becoming crucial that our science communication is stronger than it’s been before. We need to realize that if something makes sense to us, it’s possible for it to make sense to everyone!” 

He takes special care to instill this value in students, taking them on field trips to elementary and middle schools to do small experiments and show them how to simplify (NOT dumb down, he clarifies!) their work for different audiences.

These values of adaptation and communication are largely inspired by Raghuraman’s own journey through education. Having completed his undergrad in South India at Sastra Deemed University, an opportunity was presented to work alongside Toto Olivera here at the U. In doing so, was  catapulted to the other side of the globe, across cultures and into a climate that gleefully greeted him with a terrible snowstorm just to rub things in. 

But adaptation begets adaptation! Entering the Olivera lab, Raghuraman’s  interest in industrial biotechnology spun off towards marine biology, evolving into a focus on neuroscience and its relationship to snail venom. Exploring a single peptide within one snail's venom set a template that could be adapted not only to Raghuraman’s interest but to those of all other fellow researchers. It was a powerful template that formed the dynamic learning environment found in the celebrated lab today.

It’s been several years since that Utah snowstorm “welcomed” Raghuraman who is commemorating his 15th year at the U. He mentors over a dozen students while continuing his own research pursuits. He hopes his work will lead to a better understanding of how to medicinally work with the brain, that by following how snail venom targets specific areas of the mind, we can create drugs that do the same in a positive manner. It’s a chaotic path that changes constantly, but at this stage in his career, Cheenu Raghuraman is well versed to its rhythm, happily teaching students to move and sway accordingly to this ever moving dance of discovery.

 

By Michael Jacobsen

SRI Stories is a series by the College of Science, intended to share transformative experiences from students, alums, postdocs and faculty of the Science Research Initiative. To read more stories, visit the SRI Stories page.

 

Humans of the U: Gail Zasowski

Humans of the U: Gail Zasowski


June 10, 2025
Above: Gail Zasowski

I was raised in a fairly rural area where being a scientist wasn’t really seen as a career option, but when I started college, I took Astronomy 101 for fun.

 

Gail Zasowski. Photo credit: Matt Crawley

I really fell in love with it, and I realized that becoming an astronomer was a real possibility for me.

What really draws me to it is that it’s incomprehensible. I enjoy working with things that are too far away and too big for our brains to actually picture. Building models and testing our predictions — describing things our minds can’t grasp in a mathematical way — is empowering. The universe is understandable, even if we don’t fully understand it.

We’re scientists, but we’re people, and all science is done by individuals who work together and help each other. Having people around you is what keeps you grounded. It reminds you that we’re also human beings — we’re not terrifying.

I’ve met a lot of students at the early stages of their careers, and later on, when they were graduating, I would ask them how things had gone. One of the common themes among those who felt they were successful was that they connected with other students early on — people who were invaluable in helping them through classes and connecting them with mentors.

I had the opportunity to apply for a grant with a large educational component, and I met with several students and faculty to design a mentoring program. We really wanted to remove barriers in our community and give everyone the opportunity to learn from their fellow students.

One of the things I try to emphasize in all the classes I teach is that anyone can do science. Everyone can learn how to approach a problem analytically, think critically about it, break it down, and solve it. I focus a lot in my classes on problem solving, and I consider it a win when students walk away feeling like they can figure out problems in their day-to-day life.

You don’t have to be in science to think critically and problem-solve. That’s applicable in every career. Science isn’t just a set of content — it’s a set of skills that everyone can learn and use to better their own lives. Making sure everyone has access to those skills and training without being alienated is important.”

— Gail Zasowski is Associate Professor of Physics & Astronomy and hails from East Tennessee. This story was developed by Ethan Hood and originally appeared in @ The U.

 

Humans of the U: Sydney Brooksby

Humans of the U: Sydney Brooksby


May 27, 2025
Above: Sydney Brooksby in competition on archery range. Credit: USA Archery

People only get brave when they have nothing to lose. Be brave anyway.

As I entered college, I was in renal failure and had two choices: Return home and enjoy the rest of my declining life, or make one last effort to achieve my childhood dream. I chose the latter. I received an auto renal kidney transplant, picked up my textbook and asked myself this question, ‘How far are you willing to go?’ I’m willing to go farther than anyone has before me.

My disease drove me to pursue a degree in biology. It’s been incredible to be in a position, as a student, where I can exercise my own ambition by drafting a gene-editing research proposal to mitigate the effects of my own disease, Turner Syndrome (TS). I was born with Mosaic TS, a genetic mutation that causes one of a female’s X chromosomes to be incomplete or completely missing.

Throughout my undergraduate experience, eliminating the uncertainty of my condition was aided through studying genomics. I was able to take authority over my own health care. It made every surgery, procedure and supplemental diagnosis easier to comprehend and overcome.

All the while I continued competing in archery as a member of the U.S.A. RED Team with a goal of qualifying for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics.

My favorite biology course has been Gene Expression (BIOL 5120), taught by Prof. Michael Werner of the School of Biological Sciences. In this class, I learned how to translate my excitement for genomics and genetic engineering into a research proposal. With chromosomal mutations like Turner Syndrome, recovering lost genetic information is at the core of any real solution. My proposal outlined how gene-editing technologies—such as CRISPR-Cas9homology-directed repair (HDR) and mRNA delivery—could be used to ‘copy and paste’ missing genetic content onto a fragmented X chromosome. I focussed on the SHOXa gene with the goal of recovering genetic function in female hormone secretion and physical growth of patients with Turner Syndrome. Understanding the science, specifically gene-editing technologies, offers real hope for addressing TS and other genetic diseases.

I’ve been very blessed with my medical condition, and also with the knowledge I’ve gained during my undergraduate studies that allows me to theorize actionable solutions. I hope to one day attend medical school and specialize in hepatobiliary (kidney/liver) transplant surgery with a supplemental focus in chromosomal abnormalities!

What I would say to my freshman self and undergraduates just beginning their journey at the U, ‘People only get brave when they have nothing to lose. Be brave anyway.’”

by Sydney Brooksby

Sydney is majoring in biology with an emphasis in genomics/genetics, and minoring in medical humanities. U.S.A. RED Team member (archery) and 2028 Los Angeles Olympics hopeful.

This story was developed and edited by Tanya Vickers, School of Biological Sciences
and originally appeared in @The U. 

Migratory songbirds’ fall feather molt

migratory songbirds’ fall feather molt


May 27, 2025
Above: The wing of a violet-green swallow displaying it second prebasic plumage that was actively molting its flight feathers, on Aug. 25, 2024 at the U’s Bonderman Field Station at Rio Mesa. Credit: Kyle Kittelberger.

As climate warms, migratory songbirds’ fall feather molt advances by a day every year. Data from 22,000 songbirds captured at Bonderman Field Station reveal changes in how they replace their feathers.

Kyle Kittelberger holding a rare Connecticut warbler. This was only the third time this species was caught in Utah and first ever at Bonderman.

Birds regularly shed and regrow their body and wing feathers in a process, called molting, that is critical for flight, migration, insulation, breeding and survival.

A new study by University of Utah biologists examined molt phenology, or the timing of feather replacement, in response to climate change and made some startling discoveries.

Using 13 years of bird-banding data collected at the university’s field station in southeastern Utah, the research team led by graduate student Kyle Kittelberger documented how molt has shifted for birds, particularly in relation to climate factors such as El Niño. Their findings suggest that molt may be becoming more flexible and climate-sensitive in the fall, with implications for avian survival, migration and reproduction.

“In the fall, we found that birds are shifting both their body and their flight feather molt earlier over time across the 13 years at a rate of about one day earlier per year,” said Kittelberger, who is wrapping up his doctorate in biology professor Çağan Şekercioğlu’s lab. The shift is likely a response to climate-driven changes in the birds’ migration and breeding.

“Molt is a really fundamental component of a bird’s lifecycle. It’s one of the main elements that a bird does, one of the main activities in addition to breeding and migrating,” Kittelberger said.  “It allows for the replacement of old, worn and damaged feathers. If you have poor feather quality that could impact, for example, your migration. You might not be able to fly as well. It could also in the spring impact your ability to attract a mate.”

Yet changes in molt phenology have not previously been closely studied in North America. Kittelberger’s study, to be published in next month’s edition of The American Naturalist and available now online, is based on data recorded from 22,072 birds, representing 134 species, captured from 2011 to 2024 at the U’s Bonderman Field Station at Rio Mesa outside Moab.

Şekercioğlu’s Biodiversity and Conservation Ecology Lab oversees a seasonal mist net program that captures mostly migratory songbirds in the spring (early April to early June) and fall (August through early November) as the birds travel between their wintering grounds in the south and summer breeding areas to the north. The station’s 16 nets are up for six hours a day most days, depending on weather, starting 30 minutes before sunrise.

During capture seasons, the nets are checked every 30 minutes. Species, sex, age, molt stage, feather and body conditions and other data are collected from each bird pulled from the nets before it’s released to continue its biannual journey. Bonderman posts weekly and annual banding reports.

“We didn’t see any shift at the community level for spring body molt,” Kittelberger said. “Some of the reasons for that might be birds tend to migrate much faster in the spring because it’s more of a direct shot getting back to their breeding grounds so that they can start preparing for the breeding season, whereas in the fall, it’s a slower and more meandering process.”

Read the full article by Brian Maffly in @ The U

Urgency and hope at 2025 Wilkes Climate Summit

Urgency and hope at 2025 Wilkes Climate Summit


May 22, 2025
Above: Wilkes Scholar and Geology & Geophysics undergraduate Autumn Hartley presents research at the Wilkes Climate Summit. Credit: Todd Anderson

“Let’s start with the three pillars of urgency. Climate change—it’s here, it’s us, and it’s damaging,” said William Anderegg, director of the Wilkes Center for Climate Science & Policy at the University of Utah. “There are also three companion pillars of hope—it’s solvable, we’re making progress, and the benefits of solving it are enormous.”

Conor Walsh, assistant professor at the Columbia Business School, delivering his keynote address.

Anderegg’s message resonated with his audience of scientists, policymakers, business leaders and others gathered at the third annual Wilkes Climate Summit, hosted by the Wilkes Center on May 15 at the Cleone Peterson Eccles Alumni House on the U’s campus.

This year’s theme—innovation, science and solutions—was manifest in the day’s keynote addresses, panel breakout sessions, and presentations from the seven finalists vying for the $250K Wilkes Climate Launch Prize.

“When [the Wilkes Center] was set up a number of years ago, the dream was to bring immediate innovation to the problem of climate,” said U President Taylor Randall, speaking of Clay and Marie Wilkes whose $20 million donation launched the Wilkes Center in 2022. “[They] fundamentally believed in science and science’s ability to create scalable change and create scalable solutions…When I see individuals [here] dealing with this problem, I leave with nothing but hope and optimism.”

The Wilkes Center’s mission is to accelerate climate solutions through research, education and innovation, goals especially important during these tumultuous times.

“Many of the cuts to science and research that those of us around the country are worried about will hinder America’s prosperity, economic growth, competitiveness and global leadership,” Anderegg said in his opening remarks. “We need science and innovation more than ever.”

Anderegg outlined the four core questions guiding everything the center does, which capture the spirit of discussions happening throughout the summit:

  • How can we accelerate solutions to yield a global, downward trend in greenhouse gas emissions?
  • How can we get the best science into the hands of decision- and policymakers?
  • How can we train the next generation of leaders?
  • How can we foster innovation to develop, deploy and scale these climate solutions?

“The scientific understanding is really crystal clear; the 2020s are a pivotal decade for climate action,” Anderegg said. “We have a rapidly closing window to avoid the impacts of dangerous climate change and chart a sustainable and prosperous future for everyone here in Utah, around the U.S. and around the world.”

Clean energy transition and the global rise of solar power

The summit kicked off with a morning keynote by Conor Walsh, assistant professor at the Columbia Business School studying the economics of the energy transition. You can read the four highlights from his talks, reports on the seven Wilkes Prize finalist presentations as well as other expansive coverage in the remainder of this article by Lisa Potter in @ The U.

Opinion: Water Wasting? U Decide.

Opinion: Water Wasting Landscapes? U Decide.


April 21, 2025
Above: Water wise plants in a cluster of rocks on the walkway to the J. Willard Marriott Library. Photo credit: Ali McKelvy

by Nathan Murthy

Since 1986, the Great Salt Lake has dropped 22 feet. Twenty-two feet is only the height of a two-story building, a streetlight or a young Saguaro cactus. It’s not that impressive.

Nathan Murthy

But the Great Salt Lake is a wide and shallow inland sea, fatally susceptible to evaporation.

In the time the lake levels dropped, the surface area decreased from 3,300 to 950 square miles, a reduction of 2,350 square miles.

The area lost is larger than the land area of the entire state of Delaware. Water diverted for human use from the Bear, Jordan and Weber Rivers is largely to blame.

The Great Salt Lake is at risk of disappearing in our lifetime.

The inland sea is highly productive, supporting billion-dollar industries like salt, brine shrimp and magnesium. Its wetlands host 10-12 million migratory birds, including American white pelicans, snowy plovers and eared grebes.

Additionally, lake effect snow contributes to the Wasatch Front’s relatively high precipitation levels, enabling Utah’s world-famous skiing and distinctive snow quality. Without the lake, the Salt Lake Valley risks becoming as dry and dusty as the West Desert.

The immense challenge of sustaining Great Salt Lake for current and future generations requires all of us to act. Conserving water in every capacity is vital, especially among the biggest water users who must lead by example.

I examined our campus water usage.

Public universities aren’t federally required to disclose their water usage. However, Savannah Jordaan and Alta Fairbourne, members of ASUU, asked the landscaping department for this information.

In 2024, the U used roughly 227 million gallons to irrigate campus landscaping and 808 million gallons in total — costing nearly $10 million. The good news is, since 2020, water usage has decreased by 14%.

However, we still consume over 800 million gallons annually.

Although $10 million seems expensive, it’s relatively cheap for the quantity.

Utah’s water conservancy districts manage water supply via dams and pipelines, funded largely by property taxes. This subsidizes water costs for all users, particularly tax-exempt institutions like the U. Consequently, the university benefits from taxpayer-funded water infrastructure but lacks significant financial incentives to reduce their own consumption.

A significant portion of the U’s water use goes to irrigating lawns and other landscaping features. Lawns require constant watering, especially during Utah’s scorching summers when temperatures can exceed 100°F.

Evaporation further exacerbates water demand, leaving grass thirsty for more precious watershed water.

America’s obsession with lawns stems from European heritage.

Lawns were brought to North America to mimic the estates of British royalty, symbolizing wealth and prestige. Eastern U.S. college campuses often feature lush green lawns sustained by abundant rainfall.

But the U isn’t in England or the East Coast — it’s in a desert.

At Arizona State University, their landscaping features drought-tolerant trees and succulents, mimicking the surrounding desert and providing ecological functionality. The U must adopt a similar approach.

The short answer to this problem is collaboration between students, landscaping and administration.


Read the full op-ed by Nathan Murthy originally posted in The Chronicle here.

Sustainability Associate Director for the Associated Students of the U, Murthy is an earth and environmental Ssience major in the College of Science and works in the Şekercioğlu lab in the School of Biological Sciences. He is also a Wilkes Scholar through the Wilkes Center for Climate Science and Policy, also in the College of Science.