How an EV stacks up against a gas car

How an EV stacks up against a gas car


July 8, 2024

U student Adrian Martino partners with Utah Clean Energy to develop handy online tool that compares long-term costs of driving and CO2 missions of EVs versus similar internal combustion models.

Adrian Martino, left, and Logan Mitchell, right, present a research poster explaining the cost and emissions comparison tool. Photo courtesy of Logan Mitchell.

Any car buyer interested in electrical vehicles would want to know how much it costs to drive such a car compared with a similar gas-powered vehicle. Now there’s an app for that, and more.

While completing his graduate degree in the University of Utah’s Professional Science Master’s Program, data science student Adrian Martino developed a first-of-its-kind tool to enable Utah drivers to explore how certain EV models stack up against gasoline-powered vehicles when it comes to both the cost of driving and carbon dioxide emissions.

Developed in partnership with nonprofit Utah Clean Energy using localized information about Utah’s electrical grid and gas prices, the Cost & Emissions Comparison Tool offers an innovative and interactive way to compare vehicle models, emission scenarios, costs and payback of a new car purchase using real-world, Utah-specific data. 

“What makes this tool uniquely powerful is the ability to toggle between different electricity grid scenarios,” Martino said. “Users can see how their vehicle emissions shift depending on the source of electricity powering an EV, as well as what their costs and payback will be using different sources of energy. Whether it’s today’s grid, a future cleaner grid or a coal-heavy scenario, the tool makes it easy to visualize the environmental impact of each.”

Funding came from the National Science Foundation’s Futures Engine in the Southwest program. The idea for the tool originated with Utah Clean Energy climate scientist Logan Mitchell, who couldn’t find time to pull it off and mentored Martino through the project.

“I’m hopeful that this is going to become a really useful tool that a lot of people can utilize, especially stakeholders, legislators, reporters,” said Mitchell, who is also a U research assistant professor of atmospheric sciences. “I’m hoping that as reporters are writing news articles, they can refer to this tool and actually improve their reporting and make sure it’s consistent with the best available information.”

Together, Martino and experts with Utah Clean Energy utilized public data from Rocky Mountain Power’s Integrated Resource Plan to project how emissions from electricity usage needed to fuel an EV compare with a gas car’s emissions. The result is a user-friendly platform that allows Utahns to easily plug in different scenarios to accurately compare emissions and costs side by side.

“One of the most common questions we get about going electric is, ‘What if an EV is powered by coal? Is it still better for the climate?’ This tool gives you a clear, data-driven answer,” said Kelbe Goupil, senior associate for electrification at Utah Clean Energy. “Choosing what car you drive is a big decision. This is an incredibly useful resource for anyone curious about whether or not they should make the switch to an electric vehicle.”

The new online tool allows users to:

  • Compare the fuel costs and payback periods of various EV and gas vehicle models.
  • Compare the emission impacts of various electric and gas vehicle models.
  • Customize your power source, including rooftop solar, Rocky Mountain Power’s current electricity mix, its actual forecasted future electricity mix or even a 100% coal or 100% renewable grid.

The transportation sector is the largest source of CO2 emissions in the U.S., making electrifying vehicles a vital pathway to combat the climate change driven by the burning of fossil fuels. One factor that this tool clearly illustrates is that emission benefits are compounded as the electricity grid gets cleaner. The new tool provides clarity about Utah’s electricity grid as well as future projections.

Adapted from a press release from Utah Clean Energy.

Top 100 List of Global Health Scientists

Top 100 List of Global Health Scientists


June 19, 2025
Above: Kenneth Savin, Ph.D.'96

Chemistry alumnus Kenneth Savin has been recognized in TIME100 Health, a list of the 100 most influential people in global health. The prestigious list annually recognizes individuals making groundbreaking contributions to the future of health and medicine.

Savin is the Chief Scientific Officer at Redwire, a bioengineering company specializing in manufacturing protein crystals and human tissue in the microgravity environment of the International Space Station, in partnership with NASA and the ISS National Laboratory. Through these collaborations, he has helped expand access to low Earth orbit for researchers seeking to better understand the fundamentals of human biology in the absence of gravity, says the ISS Center for Advancement of Science in Space. Through these initiatives, scientists can utilize the benefits of near zero gravity in space to develop drugs that can be used to battle cancer and other diseases. Redwire says their breakthroughs “address challenges faced by millions of people worldwide through the application of organ transplantation and tissue therapy and advance the next generation of pharmaceutical therapies.”

“I am deeply honored to be recognized as one of the TIME100’s most influential figures in health for 2025,” says Savin. “Through microgravity research and development, we are seeing extraordinary scientific achievements that are accelerating game-changing biomedical breakthroughs not possible on Earth and with enormous potential for the future of human health. I am honored and proud to be part of the Redwire team and excited to see what we are able to accomplish next.”

Savin and his wife Lisa Wenzler Savin both received their Ph.D.s in Chemistry from the University of Utah in 1996 as members of Gary Keck and Thomas Beebe's labs, respectively. Lisa  recently retired from pharmaceutical company Lilly, a “medicine company turning science into healing to make life better for people around the world.” She spent 14 years as a research and development scientist before serving as Associate Vice President of Global Regulatory Affairs for 12 years. Kenneth also had a successful 20-year career at Lilly before spending time working as the Senior Director of In-Space Applications at the Center for the Advancement of Science in Space, before his appointment as Chief Scientific Officer at Redwire.

The Chemistry Department proudly congratulates the Savins on their exceptional contributions to the health and science industries.

This story originally appeared at chem.utah.edu.

College of Science Welcomes New Associate Deans

COLLEGE OF SCIENCE WELCOMES NEW ASSOCIATE DEANS


July 2, 2025
Above:  Crocker Science Center at night. Credit: Matt Crawley. Photo credits below: Todd Anderson

Lauren Birgenheier, Akil Narayan and Matthew S. Sigman are tapped as associate deans by Interim Dean Pearl Sandick

The College of Science welcomes Lauren Birgenheier as associate dean for faculty affairs, Akil Narayan as associate dean for undergraduate and graduate studies and Matthew S. Sigman as associate dean for research. Their appointments began July 1, 2025.

Lauren Birgenheier

Lauren Birgenheier earned a Ph.D. in Geoscience from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and completed postdoctoral work there and at the University of Utah before joining the faculty in 2010. She is a sedimentary geologist and geochemist whose research focuses on fluvial, marine and lacustrine systems with implications for energy development, critical mineral exploration, carbon storage and paleoclimate construction. Earlier this year, she received the Outstanding Faculty Research Award in her department. During the 2024-25 academic year, Birgenheier served as one of the inaugural Faculty Fellows in the College of Science. Prior to this role, she served as Associate Chair and Director of Graduate Studies in the Department of Geology & Geophysics.

Akil Narayan

 

Akil Narayan earned a Ph.D. from Brown University in Applied Mathematics in 2009. He held a postdoctoral appointment at Purdue University and subsequently joined the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth as an Assistant Professor in Mathematics in 2012. In 2015, he joined the U and is currently a professor in the Department of Mathematics and a member of the Scientific Computing and Imaging (SCI) Institute. Narayan’s research focuses on numerical analysis and scientific computing. During the 2024-25 academic year, he served as one of the inaugural Faculty Fellows in the College of Science.

 

 

Matthew Sigman

Matthew Sigman, earned his Ph.D. in chemistry from Washington State University and completed postdoctoral work at NeXstar Pharmaceuticals and Harvard University before joining the U as a faculty member in the Department of Chemistry. He is a physical organic chemist whose research program combines techniques from chemistry and data science to develop new reactions with broad applications, including enantioselective synthesis, energy-related topics and biologically inspired reactions. Earlier this year, he received the U’s Distinguished Mentor Award in recognition of his exceptional dedication to graduate students and postdoctoral fellows. A Distinguished Professor in chemistry, Sigman currently holds the Peter J. Christine S. Stang Presidential Endowed Chair of Chemistry and served as chair of the Department of Chemistry from 2019 to 2024. In that role, his leadership was instrumental in maintaining departmental progress and stability through the pandemic.

 

 

 

Evolutionary Biologist, Boundary Pusher, Occasional Lab Hazard

Biologist David Carrier Retires


July 1, 2025
Above: In his lab, David Carrier: "If you're going to study fighting, sometimes you have to get punched in the face."

An evolutionary biologist, boundary pusher and occasional lab hazard, Dave Carrier didn't just study evolution. He tested it — on himself, on treadmills, and sometimes in the ring.

Over a career spanning more than four decades, Carrier pushed the boundaries of what a biologist could ask, explore, or survive. From human fists to facial hair, from panting pronghorns to defrosting wolves, his curiosity led him everywhere—including the pages of Science, the airwaves of "This American Life," and the stage of the Ig Nobel Prizes.

Running Down an Idea — Literally

"In the summer of [1984] my brother and I go to Wyoming to try to run down an antelope. The idea is not to run faster than the antelope — only cheetahs can run faster than pronghorn antelope — but to run longer and farther in the heat of the day. My brother think it'll take about two hours, and then the antelope will overheat and collapse. We drive off the interstate and down a dirt road for a few miles... ."

One of Carrier’s earliest big ideas was that humans evolved to be endurance runners. Not sprinters, like cheetahs—but marathoners. His “Running Man” hypothesis suggested that early humans could chase prey over long distances until the animals collapsed from heat exhaustion, thanks to human adaptations like sweating, upright posture, and a springy gait. Running is "one of the reasons we top the food chain. Before supermarkets and food processors, before rifles and four-wheel-drives, we used to outrun our food, ”persistence hunting," Carrier called it.

The Running Man hypothesis, published in 1984, was met with skepticism from the scientific community, and from his own Ph.D. advisor, Dennis Bramble. So Carrier did what any committed scientist would: he tried it himself. He and his brother Scott Carrier (a journalist and radio producer) decided to chase pronghorn antelope across the plains of Wyoming — on foot.

Listen to 'Running After Antelope,' on 'This American Life" here.

The Wyoming Department of Natural Resources politely declined their request for permission. So, naturally, they did it anyway. The pronghorns were unbothered. The Carriers were exhausted. But the story lived on, later aired on This American Life, and eventually helped usher in a renaissance of interest in human endurance running and persistence hunting. The Running Man had arrived. Today, the "Running Man" hypothesis is cited in numerous anthropology texts and inspired a chapter in the 2009 bestseller, "Born to Run," by Christopher McDougal.

Punch First, Publish Later

Later in his career, Carrier turned his attention to a different kind of movement: punching. He began asking whether the human hand evolved to form a fist for striking—something no other primate can do.

To test the theory, Carrier’s lab designed experiments using cadaver arms to measure the forces involved in punching versus slapping. But this wasn’t just a theoretical exercise. At one point, a student — experienced in mixed martial arts —punched Carrier in the face. Repeatedly. For science. In a now-legendary twist, Carrier wore glasses during the test, banking on the unwritten rule: you don’t hit a guy wearing glasses. It didn’t help.

Then came the facial hair question: could beards protect the jaw in combat? Using wooly samples on a test rig, Carrier and colleagues found that bearded “faces” absorbed more impact than bare ones. The findings earned him the 2021 Ig Nobel Peace Prize for biology — a satirical award that honors science that “makes people laugh, then think."

Carrier’s Ig Nobel lecture, appropriately titled “Beards and Face Punching,” has since become a cult classic among fans of creative science. View lecture video here.

'David is the only PI I know who would get punched by a student, grow a beard for data, and still offer to take you out for a coffee after.'  ~Jeremy Morris, former Ph.D. student

 

Click the photo below to watch the RadioWest video of "Made to Fight."
viewer discretion is advised

David Carrier is an evolutionary biologist at the University of Utah. He co-authored a paper that argued the human fist evolved for fighting. He and his team were caught off guard by the controversy it generated.

The Human Treadmill (and Other Lab Hazards)

The Carrier Lab was notorious — in the best possible way — for its experimental zeal. Students were frequently found running on treadmills, not metaphorically, but literally, in studies examining biomechanics and locomotion. Countless shelter dogs found new homes with biology faculty and students after getting fit by participating in running experiments. Other projects involved sudden impacts, high-speed video, and a now-infamous freezer failure that involved defrosting wolf carcasses.

But Carrier wasn’t just eccentric — he was an exceptional mentor. Students came out of his lab sharper, bolder and occasionally bruised, but always inspired. His work combined evolutionary theory with experimental rigor and a sense of humor that kept even the most skeptical audiences paying attention.

A Career that Made an Impact—Literally

Carrier’s research touched on everything from breathing patterns in locomotion, to the mechanics of head injuries in football, to the evolutionary role of human aggression. His contributions have shaped how we understand the design and function of the human body — whether sprinting across a plain or bracing for a hit.

Now, as his scientific career draws to a conclusion , one question lingers: who else would get punched in the face to prove a point? Who would grow a beard for science? Who would literally run after antelope to test a hypothesis?

The answer is no one. And that’s the problem with being incomparable.

David Carrier retires with an “Ig Nobel" and leaves behind a legacy that’s equal parts unconventional, bold, and brilliant. His experiments will be cited, his stories retold, and his impact felt — in academic journals, in student memories and maybe even in the next punchy evolutionary theory.

By Tanya Vickers
Communications Editor, School of Biological Sciences

This story is based on a retirement tribute given by
biology faculty member and Carrier's colleague, Neil Vickers, April 25, 2025.