The Universal Connection

The Universal Connection


October 10, 2024
Above: Sara Warix

“One of the things I love about hydrology is that it’s something that everybody has a connection to,” says Sara Warix. “We all consume it every day, we’re all impacted by the weather, many of us use it for work or play. However far you get into the weeds of geochemistry or physics, you can always connect water back to people.”

#8 Warix (with ball) about to make a goal.

Warix has been fascinated by our dependence on water from an early age. An avid swimmer born and raised in Sacramento, it was commonplace for wildfire smoke to cancel her practices. This irony fascinated her: to jump into a large pool of water and be forced to get out due to a lack of water to fight those fires. This dynamic captured her curiosity and established the watery track of her education moving forward. She did her undergrad at the University of Pacific, continued her education at Idaho State, and culminated in a PhD in Hydrologic Science and Engineering from the Colorado School of Mines. The flow of this journey has now led to a Department of Geology & Geophysics faculty position here at the University of Utah.

Drawn to the dynamic relationship our region has with water dependency (as well as the bike trails and ski slopes!), Warix's field of research focuses on understanding headwater streams. Headwater streams are supported by upwelling groundwater before they flow into larger rivers that source downstream water supply. When asked as to their importance, Warix explains, “As the quantity and quality of water in headwater streams change, they carry those effects into the downgradient streams. Upstream changes in water quality are going to be mirrored in the downstream water quality.” An example given is that headwater stream drying frequency is expected to increase as climate alters precipitation patterns and increases temperature warming. As more headwater streams dry, there are going to be impacts on the downstream water resources that they feed into, but the severity of drying on downstream water resources is unknown.

Warix, right, collecting water samples from a tributary to the Upper Snake River, June 2024. Credit: Wyoming Public Radio

Such studies are critical, as the impacts of climate change on stream chemistry are difficult to capture in climate change models. Climate change impacts on stream and groundwater chemistry are convoluted, hidden in the subsurface and vary regionally. More pressingly, the lack of understanding of these impacts has led to a dearth of policy protections regarding drying streams. As such there is a ticking timer to deepen this understanding and to motivate a better protection of these systems. Many faculty at the U are currently working on this topic and Warix, as assistant professor, now joins them in their pursuits.

In addition to research, Warix will also begin teaching next semester, and in both roles she brings a uniquely valuable perspective. Co-mentored by Alexis Navarre-Sitchler and Kamini Singha, a geochemist and geophysicist respectively, Warix had to learn how to view and explain her research through multiple scientific lenses and to meet one mentor on their level while also learning how to “translate” their expertise to the other. Such experience with scientific communication is vital and will surely assist in explaining these concepts to students in kind.

Whether teaching, playing, or dominating the U’s water polo team in 2022, Warix’s life has always been connected to water. In a way, this is the headwater stream of her teaching career. With the skills she’s brought to the surface, she’ll surely carry those skills downstream to the students that need them. 

by Michael Jacobsen

 

 

 

Kip Solomon’s covenant with water

Kip Solomon's covenant with Water


October 7, 2024
Above: Kip Solomon, 2016, conducting measurements in southeast Greenland. The team found direct evidence of meltwater flow within a “firn” (subsurface reservoir) that forms in glaciated regions with high snowfall and intense summer surface melting.

As a ten-year-old growing up in arid Granger, Utah (now West Valley City), D. Kip Solomon spied a pipe stuck in the ground of his family’s backyard.

When he asked his father what it was, he was told it was a direct line to a vast underwater lake with an unlimited volume of water. Solomon was fascinated by the idea which raised many questions for him: Where did it come from? How long has it been there? And how did his father, who admittedly had “immense practical knowledge,” according to Solomon, know that?

“Well, he was wrong. Sort of,” says Solomon who as a child may have been imagining an underwater lake that you could waterski on. “If you dug a hole, it's not like an underground cavern or something. It was in a different context,” he concedes. But the groundwater is there, and it’s massive: ten Lake Powells’ worth below just the Salt Lake Valley.

But that “different context” of his father’s claim of an underground lake, was something Solomon, recently recognized with the Hydrogeology Division of the Geological Society of America’s prestigious O. E. Meinzer Award, would learn about during the next three decades. Most recently, Solomon, who in September was also elected Fellow by the American Geophysical Union, has been using environmental tracers to evaluate groundwater flow and solute transport processes in local- to regional-scale aquifers.

In particular, the esteemed hydrogeologist has developed the use of dissolved gases including Helium-3 (3He), Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) to evaluate groundwater travel times, location and rates of recharge and the sustainability of groundwater resources.  In fact, at the U, the former department chair who was recently announced as interim chair of the Department of Geology & Geophysics, constructed and operates one of only a few labs in the world that measures noble gases in groundwater. His research results have been documented in more than 125 journal articles, book chapters, and technical reports.

Recharge rates and residence times

So, why not just start pumping out those ten Lake Powells of freshwater standing below the Salt Lake Valley and other regions where sub-surface aquifers are brimming with the stuff?

The short answer to that is, well . . . we’ve already tried doing that and ill-advisedly, we’re still doing that. This is true not just in the American West, but across the globe from Africa to the Negev desert in Israel and from South America to the great Ogallala aquifer which underlies America’s famed breadbasket, an area of approximately 174,000 square miles in portions of eight states.

The second short answer is that we are courting ecological and human disaster if we don’t look closely at recharge rates and residence times — the time it takes for those aquifers to fill up as they have over hundreds, thousands even millions of years — of depleted volumes. What Solomon and his colleagues are bringing to the table — the water table, as it were — is more and more sensitive and complicated measurements of a startlingly complex system.

The third short answer, related back to Utah and the depleted Great Salt Lake now in a state of crisis, is that the good snow years we had in 2023 and 2024 did not refill the sub-surface bathtub of the Great Basin and certainly will not “fix” the problem of water scarcity. “We could pump this system,” Solomon says in a guarded tone, “we could fill the Great Salt Lake up easily … Okay? But only once. And then we might have to wait a few hundred years or a few thousand years to fill that system back up. That's the caveat.”

The Sandbox

Solomon’s lab in the Sutton Building looks like the sandbox of a dimly lighted playground straight out of a B-movie:  an impressive array of copper tubes and steam punk-styled oxidized baubles, huge humming spectrometers, beakers and refrigerators, plunging samples to 10 degrees Kelvin.

Copper tubes that suck out the gases that are dissolved in the water specimen from which measurements of 3He are secured. Credit: Todd Anderson

“Minus 263 degrees,” exclaims Solomon over the humming of equipment. “That's very cold, you know. And we have to do that to separate the noble gases, one from another.” Cryogenically separating these gasses is required to measure one thing at a time, and it is technology and equipment that also can break, frequently.

“Imagine that you are cooling to minus 260 degrees and then warming to plus 30 or 40 degrees and you were doing that hundreds of times a day,” he says, two of his lab group Emily Larsen and Will Mace looking on. (“Will’s over there nervous that I'm gonna break something,” quips Solomon as he continues the tour.) “It's always temperature swings and so forth. And then just, you know, just cooling to the insulation that's required to be able to cool to that temperature.”

It’s all part of the process of dating groundwater by measuring tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen that decays in a half-life of 12 years or so, to 3He, a rare, stable and non-radioactive isotope of helium. In the soup of it all is Larsen, preparing specimens by eliminating extraneous gases and sealing them up, placing them on a shelf for six weeks and letting tritium decay to the stable noble gas of 3He which is then measured.

In addition to measuring tritium, the team deploys a procedure in nearby copper tubes that sucks out the gases that are dissolved in the water specimen from which measurements of 3He are taken. It is the ratio of tritium to 3He3 that measures how long the water has been in the ground (its age).

The Solomon lab’s findings paint a much more complex … and sobering picture of how depleted groundwater, overwhelmingly the largest volume of fresh water that's available on Earth, gets re-charged and how long it can take. “I'm an engineer,” says Solomon, “so I'm always looking for solutions, but you can't look for a decent solution until you really understand the problem.”

So, while that massive volume of water under the Salt Lake Valley does in fact exist, the rates of which water is recharged to the subsurface and moves through the subsurface of that reservoir is small and exceedingly difficult to measure due to variability that is “mind boggling.”

That limited transfer is largely related both to climate and the amount of precipitation. But it’s also related to geology, “how well rocks and sediments are able to transmit water,” says Solomon referring to permeability, a property of the Earth’s soil that first motivated his work. Of late, there is an accumulating literature about the age of water, another metric that impacts our understanding of transfer rates and might lead to new water management policies and the “solutions” that the engineer in Solomon is constantly scanning the substrate for.

Why study the age of water? “If you can measure how long it took for that water to go from where it got recharged, to where you're collecting it, or to where it's discharging, now you have a means, a different sort of method to evaluate groundwater flow systems.”

One thing is for certain in the world of hydrogeology: without even knowing it, you can easily use more groundwater than is being sustainably recharged. And it’s happening right now across the globe.

A covenant with water

Talk at any length with Solomon about one of the defining issues of our day — water depletion on a warming globe — and you learn that there is no quick fix. To put a finer point on it, maybe “fixing” a system, as if taking some kind of plumber’s wrench to it, is decidedly not the way forward, the wrong word altogether. Perhaps instead we as a society should be looking at making a covenant or promise with water — a play on the book title by  medical doctor-turned-novelist Abraham Verghese — and then honoring it.

Solomon recounts recent work he has been doing in Nebraska that is one of eight states reliant on the now shrinking Ogallala aquifer. “They do something called ‘tanking.’ They go get a big farmer's watering tank that they use for their livestock. They throw it in the creek and get some paddles and probably a case of beer and they float down the Middle Loop River. And it's great fun.”  Some of that river water, he explains, is a few hundred years to 8,000 years old. “On average,” he says, “they're floating on water that first fell from the sky 3,000 years ago,” the opening salvo of the Bronze Age.

The misperception of water and its ways isn’t just rampant in Nebraska, or Utah . . . it’s global. We more commonly think of lakes and rivers as our primary water source when they are fractional compared to groundwater. And yet we behave as if that groundwater is static, infinitely replaceable in a span of time to our liking, and easily measurable. Solomon and his colleagues are doing no less than shifting the paradigm on that and in a sense almost personifying groundwater as complex, dynamic and as elusive as your grandchild. (And equally nigh unto impossible to quantify and “successfully” navigate.)

Kip Solomon explaining how noble gases are measured. Credit: Todd Anderson

In hydrology, water management lags theory by at least 30 years, says Solomon. “It takes a long time when new concepts emerge. It takes a long time to finally get that trickled [down] into practice.” That the whole hydrologic system has memory is the shift in thinking. “We are, especially practitioners, just starting to come to grips with the fact that, that we can't just look at one year of snow and precipitation and so forth.” For example, colleague Paul Brooks and Solomon have been doing some work looking at streams coming out of Red Butte Canyon in the foothills just south of the University of Utah campus. “That water recharged fifty years ago — recharge meaning [that’s when] it got into the ground. When it fell as precipitation.” The takeaway here in a community that prides itself on being hyper-aware of snowfall, snowmelt and precipitation is that it isn't enough to look at the annual amount of precipitation.

“There's memory in the system because the subsurface can store lots of water but releases it slowly."

In his work Solomon, who holds the Frank Brown Presidential Chair, travels a lot, having been on virtually every continent and advises other countries through the United Nations about out to understand groundwater systems. Recently, in the desert country of Morocco, he says, “they know that they're over-pumping their groundwater by a billion cubic meters a year. And, you know, they're trying to figure out what to do about it. But among other things, I advise them to look at the age of the water and use that to help refine their models of groundwater flow. My worry is that what they think is a billion might be 10 billion, because right now, their models do not benefit from having kind of age-data.”

The Meinzer Award

If water, groundwater in particular, is such that we should make a covenant with it to understand, respect it—including its age—and manage it as if it’s a sacred, intimate partner, then research in the vein of Solomon’s is key to that. He and other of his ilk are attempting to understand rates of recharge not just by making physical measurements, but by looking at permeability, age of water and movement of it along a flow path. It’s an infinitely more robust approach worthy of the complex subject of water.

“I think that's why I'm probably getting the Meinzer Award,” Solomon says without a milliliter of hubris.

A first-generation college student, Solomon epitomizes the best that science and engineering has to offer the curious and the adventurous. Though always interested in geology and that mysterious pipe disappearing into the ground on his father’s lot, he knew he would have to “make a living” and became an engineer in the College of Mines and Earth Sciences. But like the subject that has been his life’s work his career has wended its way—from its descent as precipitation, it’s absorption into the substrate as groundwater, it’s recharge and discharge. Now “recharged” in the College of Science as a professor of geology and geophysics (as well as a second round as department chair) he has embraced all of it: geology, geophysics and inorganic chemistry right into the cutting-edge science of isotopes.

But he has never strayed far from his engineering roots and the practical applications of knowledge. If anyone has the authority to make policy and practical management suggestions related to groundwater, it is Kip Solomon.

by David Pace

 

 

 

Utah FORGE Receives $80 million from DOE

Utah FORGE ReceIves $80 million from DOE


October 3, 2024
Above: Milford, UT. Through new drilling techniques, FORGE aims to make geothermal power accessible in a wider range of terrains.

 

An agreement has been signed between the U.S. Department of Energy and the Utah Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (informally known as Utah FORGE) to continue the project through 2028. The agreement includes an additional $80 million in funding over the next four years.

Managing Principal Investigator Joseph Moore, professor in the U’s department of Geology and Geophysics, says that “this next phase allows us to build on our important achievements and to further develop and de-risk the tools and technologies necessary to unlock the potential of next-generation geothermal power.”

Utah FORGE is managed by a team at the Energy & Geoscience Institute, part of the University of Utah’s John and Marcia Price College of Engineering.

Kris Pankow

Earlier this year, in April, Utah FORGE achieved a critical breakthrough after hydraulically stimulating and circulating water through heated rock formations a mile and a half beneath its drill site in the Utah desert and bringing hot water to the surface. The test results are seen as an important step forward in the search for new ways to use Earth’s subsurface heat to produce hot water for generating emissions-free electricity. The successful well stimulations and a nine-hour circulation test were the fruits of years of planning and data analysis at the Utah FORGE facility near Milford, 175 miles southwest of Salt Lake City.

More than two-thirds of the water that was injected underground and pushed through the fractured formation — acquiring heat on the way — was extracted from a second well, offering proof that enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) technology could be viable, according to John McLennan, a co-principal investigator on the project formally at Utah FORGE.

“Nine hours is enough to prove that you have a connection and that you’re producing heat,” said McLennan, a U professor of chemical engineering. “It really is a Eureka moment. It’s been 60 years coming, and so this actually is significant.”

Equally promising was the absence of any noticeable ground shaking associated with the stimulations and circulation test. U seismologists led by geology professor Kris Pankow, associate director of the U of U Seismograph Stations, are overseeing an extensive network of seismometers to document ground movement associated with the project.

 

Learn more about the critical breakthrough earlier this year when FORGE team members hydraulically stimulated and circulated water through heated rock formations a mile and a half beneath its drill site and bringing hot water to the surface. Read the story by Brian Maffly in @TheU.

 

What do cycling and rocks have in common?

What do cycling and rocks have to do with each other?


July 15, 2024

University of Utah geologists Peter Lippert and Sean Hutchings are helping bring attention to the hidden star of a major sporting event this summer.

I’m not talking about the Olympics, but the Tour de France, which kicked off on June 29 in Florence, Italy and will finish July 21 in Nice, France. This is the first time the iconic bicycle race won’t finish in Paris, due to the city hosting the Summer Olympics.

The star they’re highlighting rises above the competition, literally. It’s also below and all around. 

Peter Lippert and Sean Hutchings

The Geo Tour de France project (Geo TdF) is a blog exploring the geology of the various stages of the bike race. Lippert and Hutchings are two of the five North American contributors to the blog this year. They covered Stage 14, a 152-kilometer ride through the Pyrenees held Saturday and won Saturday by overall race leader Tadej Pogacar of Slovenia in just over four hours.

“The centerpiece of the stage is the Col du Tourmalet, a very famous fabled climb in the Tour de France that has lots of amazing history,” said Lippert, an associate professor in the Department of Geology & Geophysics and director of the Utah Paleomagnetic Center. “This is going to be one of the really decisive stages of the Tour this year.”

The entire race covers 3,500 kilometers (2,175 miles) in 21 stages.

“I’ve always loved this project, because it’s just such a fun way to share our science and share how we see the world with the public and particularly a public that’s probably not often thinking about the geology,” Lippert said. 

For Lippert and Hutchings, as well as many of their peers across the world, geology and cycling go hand in hand.

“Riding a bike up and down a mountain gives you a lot of time to see how the mountains put together the rocks you’re riding over in the landscapes that you’re on,” Lippert said. “We’re both trained geologists for most of our lives so it’s hard not to always be thinking about [geology].”

Utah in particular boasts captivating and diverse geological features.

“It’s mountain biking Candyland around here,” said Hutchings, a graduate research assistant in the U of U Seismograph Stations. “It’s fun to be able to climb up to the top of the hill and it’s hard to not interact with rocks on the way as well.”

“You have this new identity with the landscape you’re on if you’re able to understand what’s going on beneath your feet and what made the landscape,” Lippert said. “I think cycling is a really great high impact sense of place type of experience. You’re going a little bit slower. You get to look around.”

Geo Tour de France project 

This same sentiment was the original inspiration for Geo TdF project creator Douwe van Hinsbergen, professor of geology at the Netherlands’ Utrecht University.

“He wanted to explore a different way of sharing geology with the public,” Lippert said. “This is a total goldmine.’

Fans who watch the livestream of the race are inadvertently watching hours of spectacular geological features. The Geo TdF project enhances the viewing experience by telling geological stories that ground the competition in the larger history of the landscape. 

Lippert first contributed to the blog two years ago, and this time around included Hutchings. The pair worked together during Hutchings’ bachelor’s degree at the U and often bike together.

“I know nothing about Pyrenean geology, so this was a great learning opportunity for me,” Hutchings said. “For graduate school, I’ve dipped more into the seismology realm, so getting back to my geology roots was a fun exercise.”

Col du Tourmalet. Photo credit: Gilles Guillamot, Wikimedia Commons

Tectonic training camp 

Stage 14 passed through Pyrenees, the mountains on France’s border with Spain, with an average grade of 7.9%. That’s just under 95 miles at an average grade more than twice as steep as the incline from President’s Circle to the Natural History Museum of Utah. 

“Let’s think big” is what Lippert and Hutchings thought when they were presented with the opportunity to cover this pivotal stage of the race.

“I mean the Tour de France is big, the Pyrenees are big, tectonics are big. Sean is more of a geophysicist working with earthquakes and things like that,” Lippert said. “My expertise is in collisional mountain builds, like what happens when oceans close and mountains form. So we thought let’s just go back to basics and keep it big.” 

What could be bigger than beginning with the ancient supercontinent Pangea? For their portion of the project, Lippert and Hutchings focused on the creation of the Pyrenees mountain range which began with the separation of Pangea and subsequent plate collisions, a process they describe as a “tectonic training camp.” 

A Wealth of information

Some readers might be wondering if these passionate geologists will eventually run out of topics to discuss, even though the Tour course changes each year. Lippert and Hutchings aren’t concerned about that at all. 

“One nice thing about geology is that rocks usually stay put and you can go back to check them out year after year. So the rocks don’t change, but the way that we can talk about them does. The limit is our creativity now, what the rocks can provide, because they’re full of really good stories,” Lippert said. “There’s a wealth of information that a single rock can tell you. Where it came from, and the time it took to get there, and what it looked like at the time.” 

By Lauren Wigod

 

Two New Interim Department Chairs

Two New Interim Department Chairs


June 24, 2024
Above: Peter Armentrout (Credit: Matt Crawley) and Kip Solomon

 

Peter B. Armentrout has been appointed interim chair of the Department of Chemistry and Kip Solomon has been appointed interim chair of the Department of Geology & Geophysics at the University of Utah.

Peter Armentrout

A Distinguished Professor of Chemistry, Armentrout was appointed the Henry Eyring Presidential Endowed Chair in 2018. He will begin his term on July 1, replacing Matt Sigman.

Earlier, Armentrout served as Department Chair from 2001 to 2007. During that time, he instituted several reforms regarding parental leave and secured funding for the David M. Grant NMR Center (Gaus House) and partial funding for the Thatcher extension to the South Chemistry Building.

Armentrout whose research spans thermochemistry, kinetics and the dynamics of simple and complex chemical reactions, early on invented and constructed the guided ion-beam tandem mass spectrometer which has provided highly accurate thermodynamic measurements on a multitude of chemical species. He says of the appointment to interim department chair, “I am honored to be asked to take the reins of this exceptional department for a couple more years. The research and teaching abilities and collegiality of this faculty are second to none and will enable us to collectively advance and lead within the U. I look forward to working with them as well as our supporters outside the university system in the near term.” 

Peter Trapa, dean of the College of Science, said of the appointment, "In addition to being a world-class chemist with a towering international reputation, Peter is also an exceptional teacher, mentor, and administrator. His appointment as interim chair will continue to advance Utah's Chemistry Department as one of the best in the world. I look forward to working with Peter as we continue to build on the department's strengths.”

Trapa continued, “I'm also deeply grateful to Distinguished Professor Matt Sigman for his outstanding leadership as chair over the past five years. Matt’s contributions to the department, especially his unwavering commitment to excellence, will be felt for many years to come.”

A member of the American Chemical Society, American Physical Society (fellow), American Society for Mass Spectrometry, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science (fellow), Armentrout presently has over 560 research publications that have appeared in the literature. Forty-four students have received their PhDs with Professor Armentrout.

In 2011, he received the prestigious Rosenblatt Prize for Excellence from the U — the university’s highest honor awarded to a faculty member.

Kip Solomon

Solomon holds the Frank Brown Presidential Chair in the Department of Geology & Geophysics and will replace William Johnson as department chair also beginning July 1, 2024.

Solomon has a PhD in Earth Sciences from the University of Waterloo and BS and MS degrees from the U’s Department of Geology and Geophysics. He joined the department in 1993 and served as chair from 2009-2013.

His research includes the use of environmental tracers to evaluate groundwater flow and solute transport processes in local-to regional-scale aquifers. He has developed the use of dissolved gases including helium-3, CFCs and SF6 to evaluate groundwater travel times, location and rates of recharge, and the sustainability of groundwater resources. He constructed and operates one of only a few labs in the world that measures noble gases in groundwater. His research results have been documented in more than 120 journal articles, book chapters, and technical reports.

Outgoing chair Johnson said of his replacement, “Kip will be a steady lead as ... [recent] changes settle and as additional institutional changes occur.”

Solomon thanked his predecessors: “Geology and Geophysics is a great department and has been strengthened considerably by the hard work and dedication of previous chairs Thure Cerling and Bill Johnson. With new hires and academic programs, the future looks very bright.”

In September Solomon will receive the 2024 O.E Meinzer Annual Award by the Geological Society of America.

By David Pace and Ashley Herman

Restoring the GSL & Environmental Justice

THe social & Ecological IMPACTS of GSL REstoration


June 24, 2024
Above: Satellite image of the Great Salt Lake

 

Inland seas around the world are drying up due to increasing human water use and accelerating climate change, and their desiccation is releasing harmful dust that pollutes the surrounding areas during acute dust storms.

Using the Great Salt Lake in Utah as a case study, researchers show that dust exposure was highest among Pacific Islanders and Hispanic people and lower in white people compared to all other racial/ethnic groups, and higher for individuals without a high school diploma. Restoring the lake would benefit everyone in the vicinity by reducing dust exposure, and it would also decrease the disparities in exposure between different racial/ethnic and socioeconomic groups. These results are reported June 21 in the journal One Earth, co-authored by University of Utah researchers in the College of Science and the College of Social & Behavioral Sciences. 

"People here in Utah are concerned about the lake for a variety of reasons -- the ski industry, the brine shrimp, the migratory birds, recreation -- and this study adds environmental justice and the equity implications of the drying lake to the conversation," says first author and sociologist Sara Grineski of the University of Utah. "If we can raise the levels of the lake via some coordinated policy responses, we can reduce our exposure to dust, which is good for everyone's health, and we can also reduce the disparity between groups."

The Great Salt Lake has been steadily drying since the mid-1980's, exposing its dry lakebed to atmospheric weathering and wind. Previous studies have shown that dust emissions from drying salt lakes produce fine particulate matter (PM2.5), which is associated with numerous health effects and is the leading environmental cause of human mortality worldwide.

"We know that the dust from these drying lakes is very unhealthy for us, so the question becomes, what does that mean in terms of people's exposure to the dust, and what does it mean in terms of inequalities in exposure to that dust," says Grineski. "Are some people more likely to have to suffer the consequences to a greater degree?"

To answer this question, Grineski teamed up with a multidisciplinary group of, among others, U atmospheric scientists, geographers, and biologists, including Derek V. Mallia, Timothy W. Collins, Malcolm Araos, John C. Lin, William R.L. Anderegg and Kevin Perry.

You can read the full story in ScienceDaily.
Read more about this research in an article by Brian Maffly in @TheU,  and stories in The Standard Examiner and at Fox 13.

Meet Lokiceratops: Giant Blade-Wielding Dinosaur


Meet Lokiceratops:
A Giant Blade Wielding Dinosaur


June 21, 2024
Above: Reconstruction of Lokiceratops surprised by a crocodilian in the 78-million-year-old swamps of northern Montana, USA.
Image ©Andrey Atuchin for the Museum of Evolution in Maribo, Denmark.

A remarkable, new species of horned, plant-eating dinosaur is being unveiled at the Natural History Museum of Utah. The dinosaur, excavated from the badlands of northern Montana just a few miles from the USA-Canada border, is among the largest and most ornate ever found, with two huge blade-like horns on the back of its frill. The distinctive horn pattern inspired its name, Lokiceratops rangiformis, meaning “Loki’s horned face that looks like a caribou.” The study included the most complete analysis of horned dinosaur evolution ever conducted, and the new species was announced today in the scientific journal PeerJ.

More than 78 million years ago, Lokiceratops inhabited the swamps and floodplains along the eastern shore of Laramidia. This island continent represents what is now the western part of North America created when a great seaway divided the continent around 100 million years ago. Mountain building and dramatic changes in climate and sea level have since altered the hothouse world of Laramidia where Lokiceratops and other dinosaurs thrived. The behemoth is a member of the horned dinosaurs called ceratopsids, a group that evolved around 92 million years ago during the Late Cretaceous, diversified into a myriad of fantastically ornamented species, and survived until the end of the time of dinosaurs. Lokiceratops (lo-Kee-sare-a-tops) rangiformis (ran-ɡi-FOHR-mees) possesses several unique features, among them: the absence of a nose horn, huge, curving blade-like horns on the back of the frill—the largest ever found on a horned dinosaur—and a distinct, asymmetric spike in the middle of the frill. Lokiceratops rangiformis appeared at least 12 million years earlier than its famous cousin Triceratops and was the largest horned dinosaur of its time. The name Lokiceratops translates as “Loki’s horned face” honoring the blade-wielding Norse god Loki. The second name, rangiformis, refers to the differing horn lengths on each side of the frill, similar to the asymmetric antlers of caribou and reindeer.

PHOTO CREDIT: MARK LOEWEN.
Completed reconstruction of Lokiceratops mounted for display. Study authors Brock Sisson (left) and Mark Loewen (right) peer through the frill fenestrae (windows) of Lokiceratops.

Lokiceratops rangiformis is the fourth centrosaurine, and fifth horned dinosaur overall, identified from this single assemblage. While ceratopsian ancestors were widespread across the northern hemisphere throughout the Cretaceous period, their isolation on Laramidia led to the evolution of huge body sizes, and most characteristically, distinctive patterns of horns above their eyes and noses, on their cheeks and along the edges of their elongated head frills. Fossils recovered from this region suggest horned dinosaurs were living and evolving in a small geographic area—a high level of endemism that implies dinosaur diversity is underestimated.

“Previously, paleontologists thought a maximum of two species of horned dinosaurs could coexist at the same place and time. Incredibly, we have identified five living together at the same time,” said co-lead author Mark Loewen, a paleontologist at the Natural History Museum of Utah and professor in the Department of Geology & Geophysics at the University of Utah. “The skull of Lokiceratops rangiformis is dramatically different from the other four animals it lived alongside.”

The fossil remains of Lokiceratops was discovered in 2019 and cleaned, restored and mounted by Brock Sisson, paleontologist and founder of Fossilogic, LLC in Pleasant Grove, Utah. “Reconstructing the skull of Lokiceratops from dozens of pieces was one of the most challenging projects my team and I have ever faced,” said Brock, “but the thrill of bringing a 78-million-year-old dinosaur to life for the first time was well worth the effort.”

Discover more about Lokiceratops by visiting the full article by Mark Loewen at @The U.
Read more about the story in Discover Magazine, ABC 4 News, KSL News, Science Daily, Science News.

Backtracking Core: Earth’s Inner Dynamics Unveiled

Backtracking Core : Earth's Inner Dynamics Unveiled


June 18, 2024
Above: Banner Illustration by Edward Sotelo, courtesy of the University of Southern California.

For the past two decades, the movement of this solid yet searing hot metal sphere, suspended in the liquid outer core, has been studied closely and debated by the scientific community

For the past two decades, the movement of this solid yet searing hot metal sphere, suspended in the liquid outer core, has been studied closely and debated by the scientific community. Past research has shown that the inner core has been rotating slightly faster than the planet’s surface.

But a different picture is emerging under a study led by the University of Southern California and published this week in Nature. The research team, which includes U geology professor Keith Koper, verified with new evidence—built on analyses of seismographic data—that the inner core’s rotation began to ease and synced with Earth’s spin about 14 years ago.

Keith Koper, University of Utah

The inner core is a solid sphere composed of iron and nickel, surrounded by the liquid iron outer core. Roughly the size of Pluto at 2,442 kilometers in diameter, it accounts for only 1% of Earth’s mass, yet it influences the magnetic field enveloping the planet and the length of the day. But the core’s location, more than 3,000 miles below Earth’s surface, presents a challenge to researchers since it can’t be visited or viewed.

Past research into the inner core’s movement has relied on data from repeating earthquakes, which occur in the same location to produce identical seismograms. Differences in the time it takes for the waves to pass through Earth indicate how the core’s position changed during the period between two repeater quakes.

In the latest study, researchers analyzed seismic data associated with 121 earthquakes that occurred in the South Atlantic between 1991 and 2023.

“The inner core is just sitting in this fluid outer core, so it’s decoupled a little bit from the rest of the planet. It’s rotating at a different rate,” Koper said. “The angular momentum has to be conserved, so if it’s rotating differently, then that could affect the rotation observed at Earth’s surface. One of the big ideas in this paper is we have basically a new model or new observations about how the inner core is rotating slightly differently than the rest of the planet.”

Read the full article by Brian Maffly in @TheU.

The College of Science Welcomes New Faculty Fellows

THE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE WELCOMES NEW FACULTY FELLOWS


June 6, 2024
Above:  Crocker Science Center

Geologist and mathematician to serve during the coming academic year.

The College of Science welcomes Associate Professor Lauren Birgenheier and Professor Akil Narayan as its inaugural class of Faculty Fellows. By working closely with colleagues on key projects, the new Fellows Program is designed to develop emerging academic leaders who are interested in learning more about college administration.

Lauren Birgenheier

Birgenheier is a sedimentary geologist and geochemist. Her research studies fluvial, shallow marine and lacustrine systems, shedding light on the processes that shaped our planet's past with a view toward implications for energy development, critical mineral exploration, carbon storage and paleoclimate reconstruction. Previously, Birgenheier served as Director of Graduate Studies and Associate Chair for the Department of Geology & Geophysics.

Akil Narayan

Narayan is an applied mathematician specializing in numerical analysis. As a member of the University of Utah's Scientific Computing and Imaging (SCI) Institute, his broad research agenda at the forefront of computational innovation includes machine learning, model reduction and uncertainty quantification, among others. Narayan has previously held many departmental and university roles, including serving on an Academic Senate subcommittee and as a member of the Executive Committee of the Department of Mathematics.

"Lauren and Akil are exceptional scholars and leaders," said Dean Peter Trapa. "Their diverse expertise, coupled with their commitment to excellence, will be put to good use in these new Faculty Fellow roles.  I look forward to working with them both."

 

 

 

How Earth’s oceans were oxygenated

How Earth's oceans were oxygenated


June 12, 2024

 

New research led by U geochemist uses thallium isotopes to track the rise and fall of free oxygen on Earth 2.5 billion years ago, the process that enabled life as we know it.

About 2.5 billion years ago, free oxygen, or O2, first started to accumulate to meaningful levels in Earth’s atmosphere, setting the stage for the rise of complex life on our evolving planet.

Scientists refers to this phenomenon as the Great Oxidation Event, or GOE for short. But the initial accumulation of O2 on Earth was not nearly as straightforward as that moniker suggests, according to new research led by a University of Utah geochemist.

Chadlin Ostrander

This “event” lasted at least 200 million years. And tracking the accumulation of O2 in the oceans has been very difficult until now, said Chadlin Ostrander, an assistant professor in the Department of Geology & Geophysics.

“Emerging data suggest that the initial rise of O2 in Earth’s atmosphere was dynamic, unfolding in fits-and-starts until perhaps 2.2. billion years ago,” said Ostrander, lead author on the study published June 12 in the journal Nature. “Our data validate this hypothesis, even going one step further by extending these dynamics to the ocean.”

His international research team, which is supported by the NASA Exobiology program, focused on marine shales from South Africa’s Transvaal Supergroup, yielding insights into the dynamics of ocean oxygenation during this crucial period in Earth’s history. By analyzing stable thallium (Tl) isotope ratios and redox-sensitive elements, they uncovered evidence of fluctuations in marine O2 levels that coincided with changes in atmospheric oxygen.

These findings help advance the understanding of the complex processes that shaped Earth’s O2 levels during a critical period in the planet’s history that paved the way for the evolution of life as we know it.

“We really don’t know what was going on in the oceans, where Earth’s earliest lifeforms likely originated and evolved,” said Ostrander, who joined the U faculty last year from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts. “So knowing the O2 content of the oceans and how that evolved with time is probably more important for early life than the atmosphere.”

Read the full article by Brian Maffly in @TheU. Read a repost of it in SciTechDaily.